[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Abhishek Dixit updated BAHIR-213:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
Using FileStreamSource to read files from a S3 bucket has problems both in 
terms of costs and latency:
 * *Latency:* Listing all the files in S3 buckets every microbatch can be both 
slow and resource intensive.
 * *Costs:* Making List API requests to S3 every microbatch can be costly.

The solution is to use Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) which lets you find 
new files written to S3 bucket without the need to list all the files every 
microbatch.

S3 buckets can be configured to send notification to an Amazon SQS Queue on 
Object Create / Object Delete events. For details see AWS documentation here 
[Configuring S3 Event 
Notifications|https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/NotificationHowTo.html]
 

Spark can leverage this to find new files written to S3 bucket by reading 
notifications from SQS queue instead of listing files every microbatch.

I hope to contribute changes proposed in [this pull 
request|https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24934] to Apache Bahir as 
suggested by [gaborgsomogyi|https://github.com/gaborgsomogyi]  
[here|https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24934#issuecomment-511389130]

  was:
Using FileStreamSource to read files from a S3 bucket has problems both in 
terms of costs and latency:
 * *Latency:* Listing all the files in S3 buckets every microbatch can be both 
slow and resource intensive.
 * *Costs:* Making List API requests to S3 every microbatch can be costly.

The solution is to use Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) which lets you find 
new files written to S3 bucket without the need to list all the files every 
microbatch.

S3 buckets can be configured to send notification to an Amazon SQS Queue on 
Object Create / Object Delete events. For details see AWS documentation here 
[Configuring S3 Event 
Notifications|https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/NotificationHowTo.html]
 

Spark can leverage this to find new files written to S3 bucket by reading 
notifications from SQS queue instead of listing files every microbatch.

I hope to contribute changes proposed in [this pull 
request|https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24934] to Apache Bahir as 
suggested by @[gaborgsomogyi|https://github.com/gaborgsomogyi]  
[here|https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24934#issuecomment-511389130]


> Faster S3 file Source for Structured Streaming with SQS
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BAHIR-213
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-213
>             Project: Bahir
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Spark Structured Streaming Connectors
>    Affects Versions: Spark-2.4.0
>            Reporter: Abhishek Dixit
>            Priority: Major
>
> Using FileStreamSource to read files from a S3 bucket has problems both in 
> terms of costs and latency:
>  * *Latency:* Listing all the files in S3 buckets every microbatch can be 
> both slow and resource intensive.
>  * *Costs:* Making List API requests to S3 every microbatch can be costly.
> The solution is to use Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) which lets you find 
> new files written to S3 bucket without the need to list all the files every 
> microbatch.
> S3 buckets can be configured to send notification to an Amazon SQS Queue on 
> Object Create / Object Delete events. For details see AWS documentation here 
> [Configuring S3 Event 
> Notifications|https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/NotificationHowTo.html]
>  
> Spark can leverage this to find new files written to S3 bucket by reading 
> notifications from SQS queue instead of listing files every microbatch.
> I hope to contribute changes proposed in [this pull 
> request|https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24934] to Apache Bahir as 
> suggested by [gaborgsomogyi|https://github.com/gaborgsomogyi]  
> [here|https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24934#issuecomment-511389130]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to