Calvin,

You made me think of a license question.  With Heron, we kept a separate copy 
of all the licenses that were not ALV2 [1].  Is this something that needs to be 
done for Baremaps?

1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-heron/tree/master/licenses

- Josh

> On Aug 29, 2023, at 11:04 AM, Calvin Kirs <k...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> I'll find time tomorrow to list specific checks.
> BTW, we cannot fully rely on rat to indicate whether the license is compliant.
> In addition, regarding the modification of source code dependencies,
> we'd better list the specific files in the LICENSE file, otherwise it
> is difficult for us to judge whether this part is compliant.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 11:31 PM Calvin Kirs <k...@apache.org 
> <mailto:k...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 10:39 PM Josh Fischer <j...@joshfischer.io> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Right now I’m 0.
>>> 
>>> I’ve not run across this before, I’m not sure if it’s an issue for the 
>>> release.  See gpg output below about the key not being certified.  This is 
>>> the reason my vote is 0 at the moment.
>>> gpg --verify $FILE.asc $FILE
>>> gpg: Signature made Thu Aug 24 07:11:17 2023 CDT
>>> gpg:                using RSA key 16D7A0B27D5ADD52BD57932971751399FB39CB84
>>> gpg: Good signature from "Bertil Chapuis <bchap...@gmail.com>" [unknown]
>>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>> 
>> don't worry, it's ok.
>>> 
>>> I checked:
>>> - Downloaded; checked hashes/signatures; checked LICENSE, NOTICE, 
>>> DISCLAIMER-WIP; compiled and ran tests on OSX, OpenJDK 17, Maven 3.8.4.
>>> - Rat check showed 1441 unapproved licenses.  However, since we are a WIP 
>>> and I think this issue is known, so we are good.
>>> - I tried to run the example from the tar.gz binary, but the website seems 
>>> to refer to the repo - not a release. As an example, the openStreet Map 
>>> example wouldn’t work with one of our binary releases. This isn’t a blocker 
>>> by any means, just a developer experience idea that I thought about while 
>>> checking the release.
>>> 
>>> $ cd examples/openstreetmap
>>> $ baremaps workflow execute --file workflow.json
>>> 
>>> Because the “examples” folder wasn’t in the binary release I wasn’t sure 
>>> how to run the example.
>>> 
>>> - Josh
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 28, 2023, at 3:20 PM, Bertil Chapuis <bchap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you Josh and Julian. There is no hurry, especially if we can 
>>>> increase the duration of the vote.
>>>> 
>>>> As we all have busy schedule, I will probably extend future release votes 
>>>> to one week in the future.
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> 
>>>> Bertil
>>>> 
>>>>> On 28 Aug 2023, at 19:07, Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> What Josh said. I’ll review & vote today. Apologies.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Aug 28, 2023, at 7:42 AM, Josh Fischer <j...@joshfischer.io> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I apologize for my absence.  I will spend some time looking at it in the 
>>>>>> next 24 hours.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is one of the fun and challenging parts of working through the 
>>>>>> incubator. I’ve had votes go over two weeks before.  Our best bet is to 
>>>>>> get as many binding (preferably 3) votes on the dev@baremaps list.  It’s 
>>>>>> often harder to get votes on general@a.o <mailto:general@a.o>.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Let’s wait a few more days to get binding votes. Open-source moves at 
>>>>>> the speed of open-source, fun!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 28, 2023, at 9:10 AM, Bertil Chapuis <bchap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We don’t have enough vote for publishing our release. Can we extend the 
>>>>>>> deadline or should we start a new vote?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I see that some projects, such as Apache Pekko, ask the incubator 
>>>>>>> mailing-list to vote for their releases. Should we try to do the same?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Bertil
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 24 Aug 2023, at 14:52, Bertil Chapuis <bchap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Following our online release party (thank you Leonard and Perdjesk), 
>>>>>>>> we have created a build for Apache Baremaps (incubating) 0.7.2, 
>>>>>>>> release candidate 1.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You can read the release notes here:
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps/releases/tag/v0.7.2-rc1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The commit to be voted upon:
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps/tree/v0.7.2-rc1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Its hash is e917d5b02fdb64c3f715afd449bb1fe9ca5c2f58.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Its tag is v0.7.2-rc1.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/baremaps/0.7.2-rc1/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
>>>>>>>> d910b50ebed4200d0ef6f0c1ee3e4db0cd95ea005fe54fca66dfc4ec4dca73e96edc8913654c85c73539d6a9d27481157fea9f456a9f3aa451c178a811a89ea0
>>>>>>>>  ./apache-baremaps-0.7.2-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> fda00056b9785bbbb7f966e92cf7e118071f5b6d44f9652176a4626cec38c5b0738933b24e23efef423eafba2111bc6a22e6f00a67fda2f10b0011f9c22f3208
>>>>>>>>  ./apache-baremaps-0.7.2-incubating-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/bchapuis.asc
>>>>>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/baremaps/KEYS
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The README file for the src distribution contains instructions for 
>>>>>>>> building and testing the release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Baremaps 0.7.2.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at 
>>>>>>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Baremaps <version>
>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Here is my vote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1 (binding): I checked the signatures and the checksums; I built the 
>>>>>>>> project from its sources; and checked the binary distribution.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Bertil Chapuis
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@baremaps.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@baremaps.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best wishes!
>> CalvinKirs
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best wishes!
> CalvinKirs
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@baremaps.apache.org 
> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@baremaps.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@baremaps.apache.org 
> <mailto:dev-h...@baremaps.apache.org>

Reply via email to