It sounds good. Let's do that.
Regards
JB
On 02/02/2017 12:12 PM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
We should go with the option Kenn proposed instead of a "hard revert".
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 at 10:55 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Due to the regression in the Flink runner (and potentially other
runners), I cancel RC#1.
The fixes/reverts will be done on the 0.5.0 release branch and a RC#2
will be done.
Sorry about that.
Regards
JB
On 01/27/2017 09:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.5.0
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
[2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
* source code tag "v0.5.0-RC1" [5],
* website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
reference manual [6].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
Thanks,
JB
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12338859
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/0.5.0/
[3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
[4]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1010/
[5]
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=beam.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v0.5.0-RC1
[6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/132
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
