Sounds great, thank you! On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Jason Kuster <jasonkus...@google.com.invalid > wrote:
> D'oh, my bad Ahmet. I've opened BEAM-1610, which handles support for Python > in PKB against the Dataflow runner. Once the Fn API progresses some more we > can add some work items for the other runners too. Let's chat about this > more, maybe next week? > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > Thank you Jason, this is great. > > > > Which one of these issues fall into the land of sdk-py? > > > > Ahmet > > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Jason Kuster < > > jasonkus...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Glad to hear the excitement. :) > > > > > > Filed BEAM-1595 - 1609 to track work items. Some of these fall under > > runner > > > components, please feel free to reach out to me if you have any > questions > > > about how to accomplish these. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for writing this and taking care of this, Jason! > > > > > > > > I'm afraid I also cannot add anything except that I'm excited to see > > some > > > > results from this. > > > > > > > > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 at 03:28 Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com.invalid> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Just got a chance to look this over. I don't have anything to add, > but > > > I'm > > > > pretty excited to follow this project. Have the JIRAs been filed > since > > > you > > > > shared the doc? > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Jason Kuster < > > > > jasonkus...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey all, just wanted to pop this up again for people -- if anyone > has > > > > > thoughts on performance testing please feel welcome to chime in. :) > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Jason Kuster < > > jasonkus...@google.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I've written up a doc on next steps for getting performance > testing > > > up > > > > > and > > > > > > running for Beam. I'd love to hear from people -- there's a fair > > > amount > > > > > of > > > > > > work encapsulated in here, but the end result is that we have a > > > > > performance > > > > > > testing system which we can use for benchmarking all aspects of > > Beam, > > > > > which > > > > > > would be really exciting. Looking forward to your thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > 1PsjGPSN6FuorEEPrKEP3u3m16tyOz > > > > > > ph5FnL2DhaRDz0/edit?ts=58a78e73 > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > ------- > > > > > > Jason Kuster > > > > > > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > ------- > > > > > Jason Kuster > > > > > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ------- > > > Jason Kuster > > > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow > > > > > > > > > -- > ------- > Jason Kuster > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow >
