Thank you Kenn. Currently I am waiting for BEAM-649 and BEAM-1611. I will start again, once both of them are resolved.
Ahmet On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > BEAM-1619 is resolved. BEAM-1611 is in PR and I'll update again when it is > confirmed and merged. > > Kenn > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Groh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hey everyone; > > > > The submission of Surgery for the Dataflow Runner in the Java SDK has > > broken all streaming jobs that use Side Inputs in that runner. > > > > I'm working on a fix, ETA later today. I'd like to block the release on > > that. Sorry for the late notification. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1619 > > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Kenn, > > > > > > Fair enough. +1 > > > > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > > > > > On 03/03/2017 12:28 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> I've just filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1611. It > is > > >> technically not a bug in Beam but the easiest quick fix is to > workaround > > >> in > > >> the DataflowRunner, so I'd like to block the release on it. It should > be > > >> available ahead of the release's existing schedule, and can easily be > > >> cherry-picked. > > >> > > >> Kenn > > >> > > >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> Thanks Ahmet ! > > >>> > > >>> Regards > > >>> JB > > >>> > > >>> On 03/02/2017 07:42 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Sure, I can wait. To be clear, Thursday night in which time zone? > > >>>> > > >>>> Thank you, > > >>>> Ahmet > > >>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > [email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi Ahmet, > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Can you wait up to Thursday night ? Trying to merge BEAM-649. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks ! > > >>>>> Regards > > >>>>> JB > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 03/01/2017 07:23 PM, Ahmet Altay wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thank you. I will start working on it. > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Ahmet > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > [email protected] > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I just closed the last blocking issue, we should be good to go > now. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Sorry again for the hold-up. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 at 18:38 Ahmet Altay > <[email protected] > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Thank you all. I will wait for release blocking issues to be > > closed. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Sergio, thank you for the information. I will document the > friction > > >>>>>>> points > > >>>>>>> during this release process. Following the release we can start a > > >>>>>>> discussion about how to fix those. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Ahmet > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > >>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> That was my mistake, sorry for that. I should have tagged [1] as > a > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> blocker > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> because leaking state is probably a bad idea. At least then > people > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> would > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> aware and we could have discussed whether it is a blocker. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> There is already an open PR for this now. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1517 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 at 18:21 Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Regarding BEAM-649, it's not a release blocker, it's a good to > > have. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> As I'm pretty close to the end of the Pull Request (hopefully > > >>>>>>>>> tonight > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> or > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> tomorrow), it's a "Good To Have". > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Regards > > >>>>>>>>> JB > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On 02/28/2017 06:09 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Can we please use JIRA to tag potentially release-blocking > > issues? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Anyone > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> can just add a 'Fix Versions' field of an open issue to the next > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> scheduled > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> release -- and it becomes easily visible to everyone in the > > >>>>>>>>> project. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> In general, I'm not a fan of blocking releases for new > > >>>>>>>>>> functionality. > > >>>>>>>>>> Rushing new features and a lack of baking time usually > > translates > > >>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> bugs. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> However, I think this time it is totally justified -- on a > > separate > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> thread > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> we plan for this to be the last release before the "first > stable > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> release"; > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> and picking the new features now will provide additional > coverage > > >>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> it. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> So, +1, but please tag in JIRA. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I would like to finish these two: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1036: Support for > > new > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> State > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> API > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> in FlinkRunner > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1116: Support for > > new > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Timer > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> API > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> in Flink runner > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Both of them are finished for the streaming runner, for the > > batch > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> runner > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I'm merging the code for the first right now and the second > will > > >>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> take > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> long. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> There is also this: https://issues.apache.org/jira > > >>>>>>>>>>> /browse/BEAM-1517 > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> User > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> state in the Flink Streaming Runner is not garbage collected. > > It's > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> not a > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> regression from 0.5.0 where we simply didn't have this feature > > but > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> still somewhat uneasy about this. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 at 09:44 Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Fair enough. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I also try to merge https://github.com/apache/ > beam/pull/1739 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> asap. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards > > >>>>>>>>>>>> JB > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/28/2017 09:34 AM, Amit Sela wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd prefer we wait to merge https://github.com/apache/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam/pull/2050 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't take long now.. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:00 AM Sergio Fernández < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahmet, notice ASF has not current infrastructure to stage > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Candidates. Anyway we left unmanaged the Maven deploy > > lifecycle > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Python SDK, but it should be discussed at some point. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Ahmet Altay > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been about a month since the last release. I would > > like > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> starting the next release. There are no releasing blocking > > bugs > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> [1]. Are there any release blocking issues I am missing? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless there is an objection I will volunteer to manage > this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> will be the first release with Python content. In case there > > are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> with that it might be easier for me to resolve and document > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> those > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> part > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> of the release process. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahmet > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20BEAM%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND% > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20fixVersion%20%3D%200.6.0%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C% > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergio Fernández > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Partner Technology Manager > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Redlink GmbH > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925> > > <+43%20660%202747925> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <+43%20660%202747925> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <+43%20660%202747925> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> e: [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> w: http://redlink.co > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > > >>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > >>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > > >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > >>> [email protected] > > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > -- > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > > [email protected] > > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > > >
