Since the release would come with backward compatibility promise (?), creation of the release branch would also affect what happens on master from that point onwards. It would be good to provide some guidance on that?
-- sent from mobile On May 4, 2017 12:08 PM, "Davor Bonaci" <[email protected]> wrote: > We've been working on the first stable release for a while now -- we've > been tracking blocking issues [1], resolved many of them, organized a > hackathon [2], and improved testing coverage in various areas. > > I think we are nearly done -- there are a few more blocking issues left in > JIRA, and probably a few more that we'll discover as we go along. That > said, I think it is time to discuss the process for getting this release > finalized. > > I'd like to propose the following (tweaked) process for this special > release: > > * Create a release branch, and start building release candidates *now* > This would accelerate branch creation compared to the normal process, but > would separate the first stable release from other development on the > master branch. This yields to stability and avoids unnecessary churn. > > * Community-driven acceptance criteria > This would be an added step where everyone can recommend necessary > conditions for acceptance of the release candidate. Those conditions would > be *double-checked* manually, in addition to having all automated tests > pass. This could include important scenarios that we want to be really sure > about, e.g., WordCount example works on a given runner, TextIO can read > from HDFS, and we'd jointly validate those scenarios. > > * Vote > As usual. > > Time-wise, I think it would be really awesome to make this release coincide > with the ApacheCon conference that starts in about 2 weeks (on May 16th). I > think this would be a great goal -- and I'll do my part to make this > possible. > > Finally, we haven't formally closed on the version designation (see > separate thread). > > Thoughts? If there are no objections, I'll start this process soon, and we > can adjust as we go. > > Thanks! > > Davor > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > 3D%20BEAM%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22First%20stable%20release%22%20AND% > 20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority% > 20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > [2] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UKC2R_9FkSdMVTz2nt2sIW18KoLbIu6w0aj9 > bwSSPiw/ >
