... And remember it and make available inside PCollection (which
application produced this collection).

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017, 8:39 AM Eugene Kirpichov <kirpic...@google.com> wrote:

> In general, no - but the implementation of PAssertionSite exemplifies the
> approach. I guess it could be useful to make this a general beam feature
> and remember it for all transforms. It would probably be best to implement
> inside Pipeline.apply().
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017, 7:02 AM Shen Li <cs.she...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Eugene,
>>
>> Thanks for sharing the info. That PAssertionSite tracks where an assertion
>> error occurred. Do you know if it is possible to get the class name and
>> line number where a PTransform was added?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shen
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <
>> kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Shen,
>> > Responding just to one part of your message - "remember the line at
>> which
>> > the PTransform was added": take a look at
>> > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2247 which does this for PAssert.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:32 PM Shen Li <cs.she...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > In 0.5.0 or earlier releases, PipelineRunner provides an
>> > > apply(PTransform<InputT, OutputT>, InputT) method which allows runner
>> > > implementation to perform actions when the PTransform is added to the
>> > > pipeline. In later releases, that apply(...) method has been replaced
>> by
>> > a
>> > > Pipeline#replaceAll() method, where the runner can only get involved
>> > after
>> > > the pipeline has been fully constructed. In terms of override
>> > PTransforms,
>> > > these two APIs are identical. But, the early API could still be
>> helpful.
>> > > For example, the runner could remember the line at which the
>> PTransform
>> > was
>> > > added, and provide that info to users to assist debugging. Is it
>> possible
>> > > to add that API back? Or is there any other way to involve the runner
>> > when
>> > > a PTransform is added?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Shen
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to