+1 binding (I've been on vacation as well.)
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Back from vacation. > > +1 binding > > BEAM-2671 has been marked for 2.2.0 release. > > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Kobi Salant <kobi.sal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Spark runner was tested with word count example and a more complex session >> based application on a yarn cluster. >> Both application run successfully so we can say that spark runner passed >> the sanity tests needed. >> >> Still there is an open ticket >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2671 which Stas is working on >> and its implications should be taken into consideration regarding the >> release. >> >> Regards >> Kobi >> >> 2017-08-16 5:02 GMT+03:00 Eugene Kirpichov <kirpic...@google.com.invalid>: >> >> > Hey all, >> > >> > Seems like we're missing one more affirmative vote from a PMC member (so >> > far we have JB and Ahmet) to proceed with the release. >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:30 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com.invalid> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > > >> > > > - Validated signatures OK >> > > > - mvn clean verify -Prelease on both OpenJDK 1.7 and Oracle JDK 8 >> with >> > > > the docker development images (WIP), both OK >> > > > - Run WordCount on local Flink and Spark runners OK >> > > > >> > > > Everything looks nice, only one minor thing (not blocking at all). >> The >> > > > proto generated files for python are not cleaned correctly and this >> > > > causes the validation to complain because the maven rat plugin does >> > > > not find the apache headers on the files (this happens if you >> execute >> > > > mvn clean verify -Prelease immediately after the validation). >> > > > >> > > >> > > Ismaël, could you create a JIRA issue for this (to be fixed at a future >> > > release)? >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> j...@nanthrax.net >> > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > +1 (binding) >> > > > > >> > > > > I do my own tests and casting my own vote ;) >> > > > > >> > > > > Regards >> > > > > JB >> > > > > >> > > > > On 08/09/2017 07:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Hi everyone, >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version >> > > > 2.1.0, >> > > > >> as follows: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> [ ] +1, Approve the release >> > > > >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific >> > comments) >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which >> > > includes: >> > > > >> * JIRA release notes [1], >> > > > >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to >> > > dist.apache.org >> > > > >> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3], >> > > > >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository >> [4], >> > > > >> * source code tag "v2.1.0-RC3" [5], >> > > > >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API >> > > > >> reference manual [6]. >> > > > >> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to >> the >> > > > >> dist.apache.org [2]. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by >> > majority >> > > > >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Thanks, >> > > > >> JB >> > > > >> >> > > > >> [1] >> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? >> > > > projectId=12319527&version=12340528 >> > > > >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.1.0/ >> > > > >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >> > > > >> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> > > > orgapachebeam-1020/ >> > > > >> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.1.0-RC3 >> > > > >> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/270 >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> > > > > jbono...@apache.org >> > > > > http://blog.nanthrax.net >> > > > > Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
