There is an incompatibility between the apitools <https://pypi.python.org/pypi/google-apitools> library and the newest version of the six library <https://pypi.python.org/pypi/six/1.11.0>, on which we have a dependency. The underlying bug in apitools is fixed here <https://github.com/google/apitools/pull/176>, but we can't benefit because we have that dependency pinned. The scope of this fix is to pin the "six" library to the previous version.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:59 PM Ben Chambers <bchamb...@apache.org> wrote: > Any elaboration or jira issues describing what is broken? Any proposal for > what changes need to happen to fix it? > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, 5:49 PM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > +1 for cutting 2.1.1 for Python SDK only. > > > > Thanks, > > Cham > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 5:43 PM Robert Bradshaw > > <rober...@google.com.invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > +1. Right now anyone who follows our quickstart instructions or > > > otherwise installs the latest release of apache_beam is broken. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Charles Chen <c...@google.com.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > The latest version (2.1.0) of Beam Python ( > > > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/apache-beam) is broken due to a change > in > > > the > > > > "six" dependency (BEAM-2964 > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2964>). For instance, > > > > installing "apache-beam" in a clean environment and running "python > -m > > > > apache_beam.examples.wordcount" results in a failure. This issue is > > > fixed > > > > at head with Robert's recent PR ( > > > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/3865). > > > > > > > > I propose to cherry-pick this change on top of the 2.1.0 release > branch > > > (to > > > > form a new 2.1.1 release branch) and call a vote to release version > > 2.1.1 > > > > only for Beam Python. > > > > > > > > Alternatively, to preserve version alignment we could also re-release > > > Beam > > > > Java 2.1.1 with the same code as 2.1.0 modulo the version bump. > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Charles > > > > > >
