Agree, it makes sense only if the author doesn't reply after asking for an 
update.

Regards
JB

On 10/12/2017 11:32 PM, Ahmet Altay wrote:
We had a previous discussion about closing stale PRs. This might be a good
time to force close some of those, especially if the authors are not active.

Ahmet

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:

Agree

I will start to update/review some PRs.

Regards
JB

On Oct 12, 2017, 21:26, at 21:26, Reuven Lax <[email protected]>
wrote:
In the past, Ahmet and I spent some time each week reviewing and
pinging
pull requests. This did not happen the past few weeks due to some
vacations
and travel. I do think pinging is effective for many of the PRs at
least.

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]>
wrote:

My experience is that it takes a good amount of time to review PRs
and a
good portion of my time spent contributing to this project is by
reviewing
PRs.
I currently have 3 out of 10 PRs that are older then 2 weeks so in my
experience pinging people to about progress has been pretty
effective.
Out of those older PRs, 2 of those PRs I have heard back from the
authors
and that they would attempt to get back to it soon.

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi all,

We have hit 100 open pull requests today*. It is an arbitrary
number,
but a
good excuse to note the upward trend. In part, I think it is simply
having
more changes happening, which is cool. But it is also due to review
latency. Sorting by "last updated" the first two pages range from
6+
months
to 16 days ago.

We may, first of all, need a sweep to close stalled / no-go PRs.

After that, having a triage process where someone drops in on PRs
and
asks
"any update?" has not been terrifically helpful in my experience
(and
also
obscures how stale PRs are) but is perhaps the most active measure
we've
taken in the past.

Gitbox will probably make it easier to see who is requested to
review a
PR
and whether it is waiting on the reviewer or the author. That may
help.

Any other thoughts?

Kenn

*I'm part of the problem; 16 of them contain the phrase "R:
@kennknowles"
and I also have ~4 outgoing PRs that have stalled





--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to