Thanks everyone. Appreciate the feedback!

Henning

On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Ankur Chauhan <an...@malloc64.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> This is amazing. Having used Java ask for over two years now and recently
> transitioned to writing go for a bunch of microservices, I really like the
> simplicity. I used gleam to do data processing and loved it. That said I
> would much rather prefer the beam sdk paradigms though.
>
>
> Ankur
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 14:39 Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> This is awesome!
>>
>> With three SDKs the Beam portability vision will have a lot to offer.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Very Exciting!
>>>
>>> The Go language is in a very different point of the design space than
>>> either Java or Python; it's interesting to see how you've explored
>>> making this fit with the Beam model. Thanks for the detailed design
>>> doc.
>>>
>>> +1 to targeting the portability framework directly. Once all runners
>>> are upgraded to use this too it'll just work everywhere.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Henning,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for the update, that's great !
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > JB
>>> >
>>> > On 12/01/2017 12:40 AM, Henning Rohde wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi everyone,
>>> >>
>>> >>   We have been prototyping a Go SDK for Beam for some time and have
>>> >> reached a point, where we think this effort might be of interest to
>>> the
>>> >> wider Beam community and would benefit from being developed in a
>>> proper
>>> >> feature branch. We have prepared a PR to that end:
>>> >>
>>> >> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4200
>>> >>
>>> >> Please note that the prototype supports batch only, for now, and
>>> includes
>>> >> various examples that run on the Go direct runner. Go would be the
>>> first SDK
>>> >> targeting the portability framework exclusively and our plan is to
>>> extend
>>> >> and benefit from that ecosystem.
>>> >>
>>> >> We have also prepared an RFC document with the initial design,
>>> motivations
>>> >> and tradeoffs made:
>>> >>
>>> >> https://s.apache.org/beam-go-sdk-design-rfc
>>> >> <https://s.apache.org/beam-go-sdk-design-rfc>
>>> >>
>>> >> The challenge is that Go is quite a tricky language for Beam due to
>>> >> various limitations, notably strong typing w/o generics, and so the
>>> >> approaches taken by Java and Python do not readily apply.
>>> >>
>>> >> Of course, neither the prototype nor the design are in any way final
>>> --
>>> >> there are many open questions and we absolutely welcome ideas and
>>> >> contributions. Please let us know if you have any comments or
>>> objections (or
>>> >> would like to help!).
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >>   Henning Rohde, Bill Neubauer, and Robert Burke
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> > jbono...@apache.org
>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
>> --
> Sent from lazarus
>

Reply via email to