Fully agree of course ! ;)
Regards
JB
On 01/08/2018 07:32 PM, Reuven Lax wrote:
+1 - this is definitely one of the (multiple) things that delayed 2.2.0. In my
opinion releases should be held up for critical bug fixes, but not for features.
Any feature work can always go into 2.4.0, and with any luck we can get 2.3.0
out much faster than 2.2.0.
Reuven
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com
<mailto:rober...@google.com>> wrote:
+1 for starting the 2.3 ball rolling.
In general, I'd like to avoid holding up releases for specific
features/PRs. The is (one of the things) that holds up releases which
then is a vicious cycle for more people wanting to make their feature
a condition of the next release, etc. (Bugs, regressions, and
backwards-incompatible refinements to new features are fair candidates
as the need arises...)
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
<mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
> Hi Romain,
>
> no problem: let's try a best effort and define the target version in the
> Jira.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/08/2018 03:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> Hi JB,
>>
>> I'd like https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4235
<https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4235> to be integrated if
>> possible
>>
>> Also the JUnit 5 PR brings some light changes which can be worth the "3"
>> digit upgrade so if anyone has some time to review it can be a good
>> candidate too.
>>
>> Thanks for driving it
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau
<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/ <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>>
| Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>> |
Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau <https://github.com/rmannibucau>>
>> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>>
>>
>> 2018-01-08 15:37 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
<mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>
>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> In a previous discussion thread, we agreed that we should have a
>> regular
>> pace in term of releases.
>>
>> We released Beam 2.2.0 on the 16th of November '17, but the release
>> takes a
>> pretty long time.
>>
>> I think it's reasonable to think about Beam 2.3.0 in the coming
weeks.
>> I
>> would like to propose target Beam 2.3.0 for end January/beginning of
>> February.
>>
>> I'm volunteer to do this release.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
<mailto:jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>>
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
