Oki JB, Will implement it on my side until beam supports it then.
Thanks for the feedback. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> 2018-01-23 10:24 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: > Hi Romain, > > Definitely it's not something targeted for Beam 2.3.0. > > It's interesting, but it sounds a bit like a lonesome cowboy effort. > > I think it would have been great to discuss a bit in term of priority (on > the > mailing list) before rushing on the PR. Couple of highlights in the Jira > or PR > would be appreciated too. > > So, please, keep the PR open, I will take a look asap. > > Regards > JB > > On 01/23/2018 09:40 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Anyone able to have a look to the JUnit 5 PR > > (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4360)? > > > > Worse case a "yes we'll move this direction" or "no we don't care about > JUnit 5 > > for now" feedback would be very valuable for me. > > > > Thanks, > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
