+1 for the rollback.

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 for option 1. It is almost certainly repeated proto parsing. That is
> fixed for ParDo via generalized caching but not for other transforms. Flink
> also has a proto round trip, but the design might avoid the problem anyhow.
> We should investigate before releasing, or just preemptively roll it back
> too. The proto round trips are helpful for maturing portability and for
> preventing hacks from returning but otherwise don't matter so much yet.
>
> Kenn
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As you might have seen, I found the cause of performance degradation on
>> the
>> direct runner (BEAM-3617).
>>
>> We have basically three options for RC2:
>>
>> 1. We revert the change for 2.3.0. I think it's the fastest and more
>> secure way.
>> I created a PR for that (https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4609). It
>> gives us
>> time to investigate and provide a better fix in Runner API for 2.4.0.
>>
>> 2. If the fix is easy and with limited impact in Runner API, we do that.
>>
>> 3. We leave as it is, adding a note that direct runner has worse
>> performance in
>> 2.3.0 compared to 2.2.0.
>>
>> In any case, I would like to cut RC2 later tonight or tomorrow morning
>> (my time).
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 02/06/2018 09:42 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> > Hi Reuven,
>> >
>> > it's what I'm suspecting. git bisect should give us more information
>> (still in
>> > progress, 3 more steps to complete ;)). I keep you posted.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > JB
>> >
>> > On 02/06/2018 08:36 AM, Reuven Lax wrote:
>> >> Could this be related to any of the portability changes?
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]
>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>     Created:
>> >>
>> >>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3617
>> >>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3617>
>> >>
>> >>     Regards
>> >>     JB
>> >>
>> >>     On 02/05/2018 04:42 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>> >>     > What is the Jira for direct runner perf?
>> >>     >
>> >>     > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>> >>     >
>> >>     >     Thanks !
>> >>     >
>> >>     >     I cherry-pick on release-2.3.0 branch.
>> >>     >
>> >>     >     I'm on the direct runner perf test in the mean time.
>> >>     >
>> >>     >     Thanks again !
>> >>     >
>> >>     >     Regards
>> >>     >     JB
>> >>     >
>> >>     >     On 02/05/2018 12:06 PM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
>> >>     >     > I merged fixes for:
>> >>     >     >  - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3186
>> >>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3186>
>> >>     >     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3186
>> >>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3186>>
>> >>     >     >  - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3589
>> >>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3589>
>> >>     >     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3589
>> >>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3589>>
>> >>     >     >
>> >>     >     > @JB I didn't yet merge them on the 2.3.0 branch, though,
>> but I can or you can go
>> >>     >     > ahead.
>> >>     >     >
>> >>     >     >> On 5. Feb 2018, at 06:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>> >>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> >>     >     >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:
>> >>     >     >>
>> >>     >     >> Hi guys,
>> >>     >     >>
>> >>     >     >> Quick update on the RC2 preparation:
>> >>     >     >>
>> >>     >     >> * BEAM-3587 (TextIO with Flink) seems related to a custom
>> build with
>> >>     >     Gradle (not
>> >>     >     >> using artifacts created by Maven). Anyway, I will take a
>> look today.
>> >>     >     >> * BEAM-3186 has a PR. Aljoscha will do the review pretty
>> soon.
>> >>     >     >> * I'm also taking a look on the direct runner performance
>> change.
>> >>     >     >>
>> >>     >     >> The goal is to cut RC2 tomorrow or the day after.
>> >>     >     >>
>> >>     >     >> Regards
>> >>     >     >> JB
>> >>     >     >>
>> >>     >     >> On 02/01/2018 04:16 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> >>     >     >>> Hi guys,
>> >>     >     >>>
>> >>     >     >>> Especially due to BEAM-3587 & BEAM-3186 regressions, I
>> cancel RC1.
>> >>     >     >>>
>> >>     >     >>> We will cherry-pick fixes on release-2.3.0 branch.
>> >>     >     >>>
>> >>     >     >>> I'm updating Jira right now. When the fixes will be
>> cherry-picked, I
>> >>     >     will submit
>> >>     >     >>> a RC2 to vote.
>> >>     >     >>>
>> >>     >     >>> Thanks !
>> >>     >     >>> Regards
>> >>     >     >>> JB
>> >>     >     >>>
>> >>     >     >>> On 01/30/2018 09:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> >>     >     >>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>     >     >>>>
>> >>     >     >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for
>> the version
>> >>     >     2.3.0, as
>> >>     >     >>>> follows:
>> >>     >     >>>>
>> >>     >     >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>     >     >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>> specific comments)
>> >>     >     >>>>
>> >>     >     >>>>
>> >>     >     >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
>> which
>> >>     includes:
>> >>     >     >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >>     >     >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> >>     dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>> >>     >     <http://dist.apache.org>
>> >>     >     >>>> <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
>> >>     >     >>>> which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76
>> [3],
>> >>     >     >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>> Repository [4],
>> >>     >     >>>> * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC1" [5],
>> >>     >     >>>> * website pull request listing the release and
>> publishing the API
>> >>     reference
>> >>     >     >>>> manual [6].
>> >>     >     >>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle
>> JDK
>> >>     1.8.0_111.
>> >>     >     >>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
>> release to the
>> >>     >     >>>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> <
>> http://dist.apache.org>
>> >>     <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>> >>     >     >>>>
>> >>     >     >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
>> adopted by majority approval,
>> >>     >     >>>> with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >>     >     >>>>
>> >>     >     >>>> Thanks,
>> >>     >     >>>> JB
>> >>     >     >>>>
>> >>     >     >>>> [1]
>> >>     >     >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>> >>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pro
>> jectId=12319527&version=12341608>
>> >>     >     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pro
>> jectId=12319527&version=12341608
>> >>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pro
>> jectId=12319527&version=12341608>>
>> >>     >     >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>> >>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
>> >>     >     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>> >>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>>
>> >>     >     >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>> dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> >>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>> >>     >     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> >>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>>
>> >>     >     >>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/
>> content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/
>> >>     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapac
>> hebeam-1026/>
>> >>     >     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapac
>> hebeam-1026/
>> >>     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapac
>> hebeam-1026/>>
>> >>     >     >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1
>> >>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>
>> >>     >     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1
>> >>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>>
>> >>     >     >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>> >>     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
>> >>     >     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>> >>     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>>
>> >>     >     >>>>
>> >>     >     >>>
>> >>     >     >>
>> >>     >     >> --
>> >>     >     >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >>     >     >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
>> [email protected]
>> >>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> >>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>> >>     >     >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >>     >     >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >>     >     >
>> >>     >
>> >>     >     --
>> >>     >     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >>     >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> >>     >     http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >>     >     Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >>     >
>> >>     >
>> >>
>> >>     --
>> >>     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>     http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >>     Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [email protected]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>

Reply via email to