2018-03-05 20:04 GMT+01:00 Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected]>:

> I assume you mean https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-vfs/.
>
> I'm not sure if we considered this when we originally implemented our own
> file-system abstraction but based on a quick look seems like this is Java
> only.
>

Yes, java only


>
> I think having a similar file-system abstraction for various languages is
> a plus point for Beam. May be we should consider a Java file-system
> implementation for VFS ?
>

Can be an option but when I see the current complexity I'm not sure mixing
2 abstractions would help, maybe just a VfsIO for java users would be good
enough - thinking out loud.

What sounds clear to me is that each language will need its own abstraction
- which kind of join your proposal. However we can still make it smooth and
easy on the java side - which
will likely stay mainstream for still some years - using vfs as our java
impl instead of reimplementing the full abstraction? This way we keep our
*API* but we drop beam *impl* to just reuse VFS.

PS: for gcs https://github.com/ltouati/vfs-gcs can be a good example on how
it can work.



>
> Thanks,
> Cham
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:56 AM Reuven Lax <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Are the filesystem classes marked experimental? If so, precise
>> compatibility is less of a concern. However vfs does need to have better fs
>> support first.
>>
>> Also what about other languages?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018, 3:35 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd say to beam 2.x and to beam 3 to move all IO/extension from the core
>>> to actual IO/extension modules. Sounds compatible this way - in the sense
>>> we can have it eagerly without breaking anything.
>>>
>>> wdyt?
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>
>>> 2018-03-05 19:32 GMT+01:00 Reuven Lax <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Actually FileIO is only somewhat related.
>>>>
>>>> It's an interesting proposal. However a quick look shows that vfs only
>>>> has read-only support for hdfs and I'm not sure it has any support for gcs.
>>>> Both are often used with Beam. Once vfs supports these filesystems it's
>>>> worth looking at.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe add to the beam 3.0 hotlidt?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018, 3:26 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes (FileIO being the visible part of the FileSystems iceberg ;)).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-03-05 19:23 GMT+01:00 Reuven Lax <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm confused, as FileIO doesn't seem the same as vfs. Are you maybe
>>>>>> referring to the filesystem abstraction instead?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018, 3:19 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's the rational behind the fileIO impl?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why not using commons-vfs + a pluggable format? Sounds way more open
>>>>>>> and reusable for end users than a few hardcoded supported formats, no?
>>>>>>> What's the blocker? If there is a blocker, can't we contribute to  
>>>>>>> [vfs] to
>>>>>>> make it disappear?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to