Hello Pablo, Thank you for sharing this!
As a recent contributor I can confirm most of the issues that you raised in this document, especially Jira and PR unclearness. In the same time, current Beam contribution guide is one of the most detailed and full that I’ve ever seen before and it helped me a lot. WBR, Alexey > On 21 Mar 2018, at 15:41, Etienne Chauchot <echauc...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thanks for sharing, this is very usefull for those who were not there. > I left a couple of comments. > > Etienne > > Le mardi 20 mars 2018 à 22:40 +0000, Pablo Estrada a écrit : >> Hello everyone, >> at the Beam Summit in San Francisco, a number of folks had a breakout >> session where we considered questions of the experience for new contributors >> in Beam. First of all, I'd like to thank everyone for participating with >> your insightful comments and discussion. >> Along with Rafael, we tried to gather a few notes, and I'll start a couple >> email threads on the list to discuss them. >> >> The general theme was documentation and attracting new contributors, as well >> as communication and expectations around SDK features. Some themes within >> this were: >> - Around JIRAs and assignation of work >> - Around PR reviews and latency >> - Around SDKs, features and communication >> - Some other isolated ideas >> >> I've gathered notes in this doc, so please feel free to take a look and add >> your comments or points that you want considered: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WaK39qrrG_P50FOMHifJhrdHZYmjOOf8MgoObwCZI50/edit >> >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WaK39qrrG_P50FOMHifJhrdHZYmjOOf8MgoObwCZI50/edit> >> >> >> In the next few days I'll start email threads to tackle each one >> independently, and try to discuss some possible action items with the >> community. >> Best! >> -P. >> >> -- >> Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback
