+1 (binding) This is great. Feels like a phase change in the life of Apache Beam, having three languages, with multiple portable runners on the horizon.
Kenn On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:50 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Go SDK brings new language support for a community not well supported in > the Big Data world the Go developers, so this is a great. Also the fact > that this is the first SDK integrated with the portability work makes it an > interesting project to learn lessons from for future languages. > > Now it is the time to start building a community around the Go SDK this is > the most important task now, and the only way to do it is to have the SDK > as an official part of Beam so +1. > > Congrats to Henning and all the other contributors for this important > milestone. > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:21 AM Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding), I've had a chance to work with the SDK and it's pretty > neat to see Beam add support for a language before the most of the big data > ecosystem. > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > >> Hi Henning, > > >> SGA has been filed for the entire project during the incubation period. > > >> Here, we have to check if SGA/IP donation is clean for the Go SDK. > > >> We don't have a lot to do, just checked that we are clean on this front. > > >> Regards > >> JB > > >> On 22/05/2018 06:42, Henning Rohde wrote: > > >>> Thanks everyone! > > >>> Davor -- regarding your two comments: > >>> * Robert mentioned that "SGA should have probably already been > filed" in the previous thread. I got the impression that nothing further > was needed. I'll follow up. > >>> * The standard Go tooling basically always pulls directly from > github, so there is no real urgency here. > > >>> Thanks, > >>> Henning > > > >>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:30 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote: > > >>> +1 (binding) > > >>> I just want to check about SGA/IP/Headers. > > >>> Thanks ! > >>> Regards > >>> JB > > >>> On 22/05/2018 03:02, Henning Rohde wrote: > >>> > Hi everyone, > >>> > > >>> > Now that the remaining issues have been resolved as discussed, > >>> I'd like > >>> > to propose a formal vote on accepting the Go SDK into master. > The > >>> main > >>> > practical difference is that the Go SDK would be part of the > >>> Apache Beam > >>> > release going forward. > >>> > > >>> > Highlights of the Go SDK: > >>> > * Go user experience with natively-typed DoFns with > (simulated) > >>> > generic types > >>> > * Covers most of the Beam model: ParDo, GBK, CoGBK, Flatten, > >>> Combine, > >>> > Windowing, .. > >>> > * Includes several IO connectors: Datastore, BigQuery, > PubSub, > >>> > extensible textio. > >>> > * Supports the portability framework for both batch and > streaming, > >>> > notably the upcoming portable Flink runner > >>> > * Supports a direct runner for small batch workloads and > testing. > >>> > * Includes pre-commit tests and post-commit integration > tests. > >>> > > >>> > And last but not least > >>> > * includes contributions from several independent users and > >>> > developers, notably an IO connector for Datastore! > >>> > > >>> > Website: https://beam.apache.org/documentation/sdks/go/ > >>> > Code: https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/go > >>> > Design: https://s.apache.org/beam-go-sdk-design-rfc > >>> > > >>> > Please vote: > >>> > [ ] +1, Approve that the Go SDK becomes an official part of > Beam > >>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments) > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > The Gophers of Apache Beam > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > -- > > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >