Great that you take this action Alexey !Here are the links I have, there is 
duplicates with the ones you already
received and maybe old docs as well:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MtBZYV7NAcfbwyy9Op8STeFNBxtljxgy69FkHMvhTMA/edithttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1
wR56Jef3XIPwj4DFzQKznuGPM3JDfRDVkxzeDlbdVSQ/edithttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1Fl_LM918j7ZxAmCSkm43GBjV8knsZAIA1tRh
vJ4DneM/edit#heading=h.1lcfuwfvxg2https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zcF4ZGtq8pxzLZxgD_JMWAouSszIf9LnFANWHKBsZlg/editht
tps://docs.google.com/document/d/1AQmx-T9XjSi1PNoEp5_L-
lT0j7BkgTbmQnc6uFEMI4c/edit#heading=h.dtl8cwoybr2yhttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1u-
4o_0uj8uKa2SVNPBNxIKfvcJ4t66ecCoU1M2yVoDA/edit#heading=h.c1deqkr0bp31https://docs.google.com/document/d/17H2sBEtnoTSxjzl
rz7rmKtX5E3F0mW1NpFQzWzSYOpY/edit#heading=h.1lcfuwfvxg2https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tnG2DPHZYbsomvihIpXruUmQ12pHG
K0QIvXS1FOTgRc/edit#heading=h.puuotbien1gfhttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1KEtUPE5d6oCZFvFlR7PtSDvHpx5kDj2dTlIxF7UXa5
w/edit#heading=h.p6lvszfbmyj6https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IGduUqmhWDi_69l9nG8kw73HZ5WI5wOps9Tshl5wpQA/edit#headin
g=h.gh88g5y0rekphttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1NehB__CxJTmjxkt7hDYIJWNDLJyEoE0b-
AUJvInHPCI/edit#heading=h.gh88g5y0rekphttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOozW0bzBuz4oHJEuZNDOHdzaV5Y56ix58Ozrqm2jFg/ed
it#heading=h.gh88g5y0rekphttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1XYzb1Fnt2sam7u2MsGFaZp-2qSIGxUn66VLer-
bcXAk/edit#heading=h.p6lvszfbmyj6https://docs.google.com/document/d/1voyUIQ2DrWkoY-
BsJwM8YvF4gGKB76CDG8BYL8XBc7A/edit#heading=h.vv2fbulkp7t
Etienne


Le jeudi 24 mai 2018 à 14:53 +0200, Alexey Romanenko a écrit :
> Thank you everybody for positive feedback and sending me links to design 
> docs. I’m going to complete the full list and
> create PR for review.
> Griselda
> Perhaps, it was a bit of misunderstanding here, let me explain what I assume 
> under creating of such page. 
> 
> Actually, for now I’m going to collect all known design docs under one 
> umbrella (the page on Beam web site) to make it
> easy to discover. For example, as a new contributor, I’d like to know more 
> details what was initial design of new
> FileIO, SDF, Metrics, etc. 
> 
> I'm not going to copy the content of this docs to one page or even web site, 
> let’s keep this as it is, no changes here
> for the moment. I think, moving to something else than Google docs is a tough 
> question and requires another
> discussion. 
> 
> So, in this case, this task seems not so hard since we don’t add such docs 
> too often - I'll just have to update this
> index page on web site. In addition, the authors will be always welcomed to 
> update this page by themselves. In my
> turn, I’ll try to keep an eye on this to keep it synced. And of course, any 
> help will be welcomed too =)
> 
> WBR,
> Alexey
> 
> > On 24 May 2018, at 00:01, Griselda Cuevas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Everyone, 
> > 
> > @Alexey, I think this is a great idea, I'd like to understand more of the 
> > motivation behind having all the designs
> > doc under a single page. In my opinion it could become a challenge to 
> > maintain a page, so knowing what you want to
> > accomplish could help us think of alternative solutions? 
> > On Wed, 23 May 2018 at 14:08, Daniel Oliveira <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > > +1 to web site page (not Google Doc).
> > > 
> > > Definitely agree that a common entry point would be excellent. I don't 
> > > like the idea of the Google Doc so much
> > > because it's not very good for having changes reviewed and keeping track 
> > > of who added what, unlike Github. Adding
> > > an entry to the list in the website would require reviews and leave 
> > > behind a commit history, which I think is
> > > important for an authoritative source like this.
> > > 
> > > PS: I also have a doc I proposed that I didn't see in the lists:
> > > https://s.apache.org/beam-runner-api-combine-model
> > > 
> > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:52 PM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > +1, Thanks for picking this up Alexey
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:41 AM Huygaa Batsaikhan <[email protected]> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > +1. That is great, Alexey. Robin and I are working on documenting 
> > > > > some missing pieces of Java SDK. We will let
> > > > > you know when we create polished documents.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 9:28 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > +1 and thanks for volunteering for this Alexey.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > We really need to make this more accesible.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:00 PM Alexey Romanenko 
> > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Joseph, Eugene - thank you very much for the links!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > All, regarding one common entry point for all design documents. 
> > > > > > > Could we
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > just have a dedicated page on Beam web site with a list of links to 
> > > > > > every
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > proposed document? Every entry (optionally) might contain, in 
> > > > > > addition,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > short abstract and list of author(s). In this case, it would be 
> > > > > > easily
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > searchable and available for those who are interested in this.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > In the same time, using a Google doc for writing/discussing the 
> > > > > > > documents
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > seems more than reasonable since it’s quite native and easy to use. 
> > > > > > I only
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > propose to have a common entry point to fall of them.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > If this idea looks feasible, I’d propose myself to collect the 
> > > > > > > links to
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > already created documents, create such page and update this list in 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > future.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > WBR,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Alexey
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On 22 May 2018, at 21:34, Eugene Kirpichov <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Making it easier to manage indeed would be good. Could someone 
> > > > > > > from PMC
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > please add the following documents of mine to it?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > SDF related documents:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/splittable-do-fn
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/sdf-via-source
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/textio-sdf
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/beam-watch-transform
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/beam-breaking-fusion
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Non SDF related:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/context-fn
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/fileio-write
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > A suggestion: maybe we can establish a convention to send design 
> > > > > > > document
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > proposals to [email protected]? Does the Apache mailing 
> > > > > > list
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > management software support this kind of stuff? Then they'd be 
> > > > > > quite easy
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > to find and filter.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:57 AM Kenneth Knowles 
> > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >> It is owned by the Beam PMC collectively. Any PMC member can add 
> > > > > > >> things
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > to it. Ideas for making it easy to manage are welcome.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >> Probably easier to have a markdown file somewhere with a list of 
> > > > > > >> docs so
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > we can issue and review PRs. Not sure the web site is the right 
> > > > > > place for
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > it - we have a history of porting docs to markdown but really that 
> > > > > > is high
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > overhead and users/community probably don't gain from it so much. 
> > > > > > Some have
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > suggested a wiki.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >> Kenn
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:22 AM Scott Wegner 
> > > > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>> Thanks for the links. Any details on that Google drive folder? 
> > > > > > >>> Who
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > maintains it? Is it possible for any contributor to add their 
> > > > > > design doc?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:15 AM Joseph PENG 
> > > > > > >>> <[email protected]>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>> Alexey,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>> I do not know where you can find all design docs, but I know a 
> > > > > > >>>> blog
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > that has collected some of the major design docs. Hope it helps.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>> https://wtanaka.com/beam/design-doc
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B-IhJZh9Ab52OFBVZHpsNjc4eXc
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:28 AM Alexey Romanenko <
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>>> Hi all,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>>> Is it possible to obtain somewhere a list of all proposals /
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > prototype documents that have been published as a technical / design
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > documents for new features? I have links to only some of them 
> > > > > > (found in
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > mail list discussions by chance) but I’m not aware of others.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>>> If yes, could someone share it or point me out where it is 
> > > > > > >>>>> located in
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > case if I missed this?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>>> If not, don’t you think it would make sense to have such 
> > > > > > >>>>> index of
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > these documents? I believe it can be useful for Beam contributors 
> > > > > > since
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > these proposals contain information which is absent or not so 
> > > > > > detailed on
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Beam web site documentation.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>>> WBR,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>>> Alexey
> > > > > > 

Reply via email to