+1 On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <jasonkus...@google.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and > evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <amyrv...@google.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of 90) >> to match the contribute policy. >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate >>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and >>> then close them after a 7 day grace period. >>> >>> For more details, see: >>> >>> - our stale PR policy [1] >>> - the discussion thread [2] >>> - Probot stale [3] >>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4] >>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5] >>> - Example PR that would activate it [6] >>> >>> Please vote: >>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale >>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> Kenn >>> >>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests >>> [2] >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale >>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423 >>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589 >>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532 >>> >> > > -- > ------- > Jason Kuster > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow > > See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback >
