+1

2018-06-04 9:12 GMT+02:00 Etienne Chauchot <echauc...@apache.org>:

> +1
> As I was already applying this.
>
> Le samedi 02 juin 2018 à 11:24 +0300, Reuven Lax a écrit :
>
> +1
>
> I believe only some committers were aware of the old policy, and others
> were effectively doing this anyway.
>
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 2:51 AM Scott Wegner <sweg...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:44 PM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1 :) glad that we had this discussion
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 3:38 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:46 PM Andrew Pilloud <apill...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1 - I hope this doesn't reduce the urgency to fix the root cause: not
> having enough committers.
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:18 PM Henning Rohde <hero...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:27 PM Dan Halperin <dhalp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 -- this is encoding what I previously thought the process was and what,
> in practice, I think was often the behavior of committers anyway.
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Yifan Zou <yifan...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:10 PM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:06 PM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Cham
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:36 AM Jason Kuster <jasonkus...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:36 AM Ankur Goenka <goe...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:28 AM Charles Chen <c...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:20 AM Valentyn Tymofieiev <valen...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:25 AM Thomas Groh <tg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> As we seem to largely have consensus in "Reducing Committer Load for Code
> Reviews"[1], this is a vote to change the Beam policy on Code Reviews to
> require that
>
> (1) At least one committer is involved with the code review, as either a
> reviewer or as the author
> (2) A contributor has approved the change
>
> prior to merging any change.
>
> This changes our policy from its current requirement that at least one
> committer *who is not the author* has approved the change prior to merging.
> We believe that changing this process will improve code review throughput,
> reduce committer load, and engage more of the community in the code review
> process.
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1: Accept the above proposal to change the Beam code review/merge
> policy
> [ ] -1: Leave the Code Review policy unchanged
>
> Thanks,
>
> Thomas
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c1fde3884fbefacc252b6d4b434f9
> a9c2cf024f381654aa3e47df18@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to