No problem Pablo. The vote period is a minimum, it can be extended as requested or if we don't have the minimum of 3 binding votes.
Regards JB On 09/06/2018 01:54, Pablo Estrada wrote: > Hello all, > I'd like to request an extension of the voting period until Monday > evening (US time, so later in other geographical regions). This is > because we were only now able to publish Dataflow Workers, and have not > had the chance to run release validation tests on them. The extension > will allow us to validate and vote by Monday. > Is this acceptable to the community? > > Best > -P. > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 6:20 AM Alexey Romanenko > <aromanenko....@gmail.com <mailto:aromanenko....@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Thank you JB for your work! > > I tested running simple streaming (/KafkaIO/) and batch (/TextIO / > HDFS/) pipelines with SparkRunner on YARN cluster - it works fine. > > WBR, > Alexey > > >> On 8 Jun 2018, at 10:00, Etienne Chauchot <echauc...@apache.org >> <mailto:echauc...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> I forgot to vote: >> +1 (non binding). >> What I tested: >> - no functional or performance regression comparing to v2.4 >> - dependencies in the poms are ok >> >> Etienne >> Le vendredi 08 juin 2018 à 08:27 +0200, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : >>> +1 (non-binding), mainstream usage is not broken by the pom >>> changes and runtime has no known regression compared to the 2.4.0 >>> >>> (side note: kudo to JB for this build tool change release, I know >>> how it can hurt ;)) >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>> >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >>> >>> >>> Le jeu. 7 juin 2018 à 16:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit : >>>> Thanks for the details Etienne ! >>>> >>>> The good news is that the artifacts seem OK and the overall Nexmark >>>> results are consistent with the 2.4.0 release ones. >>>> >>>> I'm starting a complete review using the beam-samples as well. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 07/06/2018 16:14, Etienne Chauchot wrote: >>>> > Hi, >>>> > I've just run the nexmark queries on v2.5.0-RC1 tag >>>> > What we can notice: >>>> > - query 3 (exercises CoGroupByKey, state and timer) shows >>>> different >>>> > output with DR between batch and streaming and with the other >>>> runners => >>>> > I compared with v2.4 there were still these differences but with >>>> > different output size numbers >>>> > >>>> > - query 6 (exercises specialized combiner) shows different output >>>> > between the runners => the correct output is 401. strange that >>>> in batch >>>> > mode some runners output les Sellers. I compared with v2.4 >>>> same output >>>> > >>>> > - response time of query 7 (exercices Max transform, fanout >>>> and side >>>> > input) is very slow on DR => I compared with v2.4 , comparable >>>> execution >>>> > times >>>> > >>>> > I'm not comparing q10 because it is a write to GCS so it is >>>> very specific. >>>> > >>>> > => Basically no regression comparing to v2.4 >>>> > >>>> > For the record here is the output (waiting for ongoing perfkit >>>> integration): >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > 1. DR batch >>>> > >>>> > Performance: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Conf Runtime(sec) (Baseline) Events(/sec) (Baseline) >>>> Results (Baseline) >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0000 5,8 17283,1 >>>> 100000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0001 3,2 31104,2 >>>> 92000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0002 1,2 82918,7 >>>> 351 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0003 2,2 46210,7 >>>> 458 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0004 1,2 8503,4 >>>> 40 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0005 4,0 25220,7 >>>> 12 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0006 0,9 11148,3 >>>> 401 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0007 13,2 7580,9 >>>> 1 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0008 1,5 67340,1 >>>> 6000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0009 0,7 14025,2 >>>> 298 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0010 12,8 7793,0 >>>> 1 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0011 2,4 42319,1 >>>> 1919 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0012 1,6 61462,8 >>>> 1919 >>>> > >>>> >>>> ========================================================================================== >>>> > >>>> > 2. DR streaming >>>> > >>>> > Performance: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Conf Runtime(sec) (Baseline) Events(/sec) (Baseline) >>>> Results (Baseline) >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0000 6,5 15285,8 >>>> 100000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0001 3,7 27397,3 >>>> 92000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0002 1,4 69108,5 >>>> 351 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0003 3,2 31181,8 >>>> 447 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0004 1,2 8361,2 >>>> 40 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0005 5,3 18903,6 >>>> 12 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0006 0,9 11111,1 >>>> 401 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0007 82,5 1212,2 >>>> 1 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0008 2,0 51072,5 >>>> 6000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0009 0,8 12903,2 >>>> 298 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0010 49,5 2021,8 >>>> 1 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0011 3,9 25667,4 >>>> 1919 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0012 2,4 41067,8 >>>> 1919 >>>> > >>>> >>>> ========================================================================================== >>>> > >>>> > 3. Flink batch >>>> > Performance: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Conf Runtime(sec) (Baseline) Events(/sec) (Baseline) >>>> Results (Baseline) >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0000 1,0 97656,3 >>>> 100000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0001 0,7 141643,1 >>>> 92000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0002 0,4 228310,5 >>>> 351 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0003 1,6 64020,5 >>>> 580 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0004 0,7 13831,3 >>>> 40 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0005 1,4 72939,5 >>>> 12 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0006 0,5 20491,8 >>>> 103 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0007 1,3 74239,0 >>>> 1 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0008 0,8 121506,7 >>>> 6000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0009 0,6 17953,3 >>>> 298 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0010 1,3 74682,6 >>>> 1 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0011 1,1 92936,8 >>>> 1919 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0012 0,8 123001,2 >>>> 1919 >>>> > >>>> >>>> ========================================================================================== >>>> > >>>> > 4. Flink streaming >>>> > Performance: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Conf Runtime(sec) (Baseline) Events(/sec) (Baseline) >>>> Results (Baseline) >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0000 5,4 18677,6 >>>> 100000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0001 2,8 35511,4 >>>> 92000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0002 1,8 54318,3 >>>> 351 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0003 2,4 41614,6 >>>> 580 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0004 1,0 10341,3 >>>> 40 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0005 3,4 29568,3 >>>> 12 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0006 0,7 13369,0 >>>> 401 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0007 2,8 36192,5 >>>> 1 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0008 1,8 54854,6 >>>> 6000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0009 0,7 13369,0 >>>> 298 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0010 3,4 29841,8 >>>> 2 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0011 5,0 19932,2 >>>> 1919 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0012 2,6 38835,0 >>>> 1919 >>>> > >>>> >>>> ========================================================================================== >>>> > >>>> > 5. Spark batch >>>> > Performance: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Conf Runtime(sec) (Baseline) Events(/sec) (Baseline) >>>> Results (Baseline) >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0000 1,5 65445,0 >>>> 100000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0001 1,3 79491,3 >>>> 92000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0002 0,9 112107,6 >>>> 351 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0003 2,0 48804,3 >>>> 580 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0004 1,2 8382,2 >>>> 40 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0005 2,0 50838,8 >>>> 12 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0006 1,0 9699,3 >>>> 103 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0007 2,3 43308,8 >>>> 1 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0008 2,1 46794,6 >>>> 6000 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0009 1,1 8976,7 >>>> 298 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0010 1,6 62111,8 >>>> 1 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0011 2,1 46598,3 >>>> 1919 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 0012 2,3 43687,2 >>>> 1919 >>>> > >>>> >>>> ========================================================================================== >>>> > >>>> > Le mercredi 06 juin 2018 à 10:50 +0200, Etienne Chauchot a écrit : >>>> >> Thanks JB for all your work ! I believe doing the first >>>> gradle release >>>> >> must have been hard. >>>> >> I'll run Nexmark on the release and keep you posted. >>>> >> >>>> >> Best >>>> >> Etienne >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Le mercredi 06 juin 2018 à 10:44 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> a écrit : >>>> >>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the >>>> version >>>> >>> 2.5.0, as follows: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >>>> >>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific >>>> comments) >>>> >>> >>>> >>> NB: this is the first release using Gradle, so don't be too >>>> harsh ;) A >>>> >>> PR about the release guide will follow thanks to this release. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> The complete staging area is available for your review, >>>> which includes: >>>> >>> * JIRA release notes [1], >>>> >>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to >>>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> >>>> >>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3], >>>> >>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central >>>> Repository [4], >>>> >>> * source code tag "v2.5.0-RC1" [5], >>>> >>> * website pull request listing the release and publishing >>>> the API >>>> >>> reference manual [6]. >>>> >>> * Java artifacts were built with Gradle 4.7 (wrapper) and >>>> OpenJDK/Oracle >>>> >>> JDK 1.8.0_172 (Oracle Corporation 25.172-b11). >>>> >>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source >>>> release to the >>>> >>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2]. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted >>>> by majority >>>> >>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Thanks, >>>> >>> JB >>>> >>> >>>> >>> [1] >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12342847 >>>> >>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.5.0/ >>>> >>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >>>> >>> [4] >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1041/ >>>> >>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.5.0-RC1 >>>> >>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/463 >>>> >>> >>>> > > -- > Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
