It is expected that old releases are removed and archived:
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#when-to-archive

Old releases are available from http://archive.apache.org/dist/beam/


On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Dan Halperin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Looks like JB removed these during release of 2.3.0:
>
> svn commit: r25111 - in /release/beam: ./ 0.1.0-incubating/
> 0.2.0-incubating/ 0.3.0-incubating/ 0.4.0/ 0.5.0/ 0.6.0/ 2.0.0/ 2.1.0/
> 2.1.1/ 2.2.0/ 2.3.0/
>
> Author: jbonofre
> Date: Sat Feb 17 06:08:19 2018
> New Revision: 25111
>
> Log:
> Publish 2.3.0 release
>
> Added:
>     release/beam/2.3.0/
>     release/beam/2.3.0/apache-beam-2.3.0-python.zip   (with props)
>     release/beam/2.3.0/apache-beam-2.3.0-python.zip.asc
>     release/beam/2.3.0/apache-beam-2.3.0-python.zip.md5
>     release/beam/2.3.0/apache-beam-2.3.0-python.zip.sha1
>     release/beam/2.3.0/apache-beam-2.3.0-source-release.zip   (with props)
>     release/beam/2.3.0/apache-beam-2.3.0-source-release.zip.asc
>     release/beam/2.3.0/apache-beam-2.3.0-source-release.zip.md5
>     release/beam/2.3.0/apache-beam-2.3.0-source-release.zip.sha1
>     release/beam/latest   (with props)
> Removed:
>     release/beam/0.1.0-incubating/
>     release/beam/0.2.0-incubating/
>     release/beam/0.3.0-incubating/
>     release/beam/0.4.0/
>     release/beam/0.5.0/
>     release/beam/0.6.0/
>     release/beam/2.0.0/
>     release/beam/2.1.0/
>     release/beam/2.1.1/
>     release/beam/2.2.0/
>
>
> I don't think this is the intended release process -- don't we want them
> up forever?
>
> Suggest partial revert of that SVN commit to restore the old releases.
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 1:39 PM Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I noticed that links to source code of releases is broken in the
>> following page for everything but the latest release.
>>
>> https://beam.apache.org/get-started/downloads/
>>
>> For example http://www-eu.apache.org/dist/beam/2.3.0/apache-
>> beam-2.3.0-source-release.zip
>>
>> Anybody know how to fix this ?
>>
>> - Cham
>>
>

Reply via email to