Hi everyone, Thanks for your feedback on the doc. I have revamped it according to all of the comments. The major changes I have made are: * The problem description should be more general and accurate now. * I added more background information, such as details about Reshuffle, so I should be easier to understand now. * I made it clear what is the scope of my current project and what could be left to future work. * It now reflects the current progress of my work, and discusses how it should work with the portable pipeline representation (WIP)
Also, I forgot to mention last time that this doc may be interesting to those of you interested in Reshuffle, because Reshuffle is used as a current workaround for the problem described in the doc. More comments are always welcome. Best, Robin On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 7:34 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote: > Thanks for the write up. It is great to see someone pushing this through. > > I wanted to bring Luke's high-level question back to the list for > visibility: what about portability and other SDKs? > > Portability is probably trivial, but the "other SDKs" question is probably > best answered by folks working on them who can have opinions about how it > works in their SDKs idioms. > > Kenn > >
