Alexey, One doc that can be interesting that I forgot to point out is https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VgnGiVu8vSfm7Et-xAtQYv 0PlEpqeyfmhpQUNPmWRJs/edit?usp=sharingIt is the doc I wrote when I submitted Nexmark PR to ease the reading of the code. It is not a design doc, I don't know if it belongs to the website page or to the wiki for beam devs. Etienne
Le mercredi 06 juin 2018 à 17:48 +0200, Alexey Romanenko a écrit : > FYI: Finally, it was merged and you can find this page > here:https://beam.apache.org/contribute/design-documents/ > > Thank you everybody who helped me to compile this list! > I’ll try to do my best to update this with new coming docs. In the same time, > please, feel free to add your new docs > (or notify me if I missed this) once they are finished and ready to be > published. > > WBR, > Alexey > > > On 31 May 2018, at 18:52, Eugene Kirpichov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thank you! > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 8:30 AM Alexey Romanenko <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Thank you everybody for provided links. I collected all of them (please, > > > correct me if I missed something), > > > categorized and created a dedicated page for Beam website. > > > Here is a PR for that (please, review): > > > https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/456 > > > > > > WBR, > > > Alexey > > > > > > > On 30 May 2018, at 13:17, Łukasz Gajowy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I just wanted to add those two (sorry for being kinda late with this): > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dA-5s6OHiP_cz-NRAbwapoKF5MEC1wKps4A5tFbIPKE/edit?usp=sharing > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Cb7XVmqe__nA_WCrriAifL-3WCzbZzV4Am5W_SkQLeA/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Łukasz > > > > 2018-05-29 22:42 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]>: > > > > > Providing ownership to the PMC account allows others to take over > > > > > ownership of the document once a contributor > > > > > stops being active. This allows docs to be updated (even if just to > > > > > point to a newer doc). > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 1:20 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > My position on ownership is design docs are really documents "of > > > > > > the moment" and authored by a particular > > > > > > individual or group. Experience shows that even if you try, keeping > > > > > > it fresh is not likely to happen. > > > > > > Anything that needs freshness (like end-user docs) should be in a > > > > > > different medium. I would just date the > > > > > > gdoc so readers know how to interpret it (the automated "last edit" > > > > > > date is not sufficient for understanding > > > > > > how stale something is). > > > > > > So it seems like it makes little difference if the project or PMC > > > > > > has ownership or even write access. Of > > > > > > course I have no objections if someone wants to transfer ownership, > > > > > > but is there a reason to encourage it? > > > > > > Kenn > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 1:11 PM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I transferred ownership of the docs that I owned to the > > > > > > > [email protected] PMC account and put the ones > > > > > > > that I owned into the drive folder. > > > > > > > Would it be a good idea for others to follow suit? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instructions on how to transfer ownership are here: > > > > > > > http://support.it.mtu.edu/Accounts/E-Mail/75946047/How > > > > > > > -do-I-transfer-ownership-of-a-Google-Doc.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:23 AM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I created a PR for the beam-site to link to the design docs and > > > > > > > > template from the contribution guide:htt > > > > > > > > ps://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/454 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:23 AM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Here are some more links related to portability efforts: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-fn-api > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-fn-api-processing-a-bundle > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-fn-api-send-and-receive-data > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-fn-state-api-and-bundle-processing > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-fn-api-progress-reporting > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-fn-api-container-contract > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-breaking-fusion > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-runner-api-combine-model > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-fn-api-metrics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:11 PM Scott Wegner > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for sharing these. I also put together a design doc > > > > > > > > > > template based on common styling / > > > > > > > > > > sections I saw in the docs listed above. Others are free to > > > > > > > > > > use it as they'd like. > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kVePqjt2daZd0bQHGUwghlcLbhvrny7VpflAzk9sjUg/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:23 AM Kenneth Knowles > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > OK, I will also put a list here of those I know off the > > > > > > > > > > > top of my head. Some are redundant with > > > > > > > > > > > Etienne's but short links that I can think of: > > > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/a-new-dofn > > > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-triggers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-sink-triggers > > > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-runner-composites > > > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-lateness > > > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-runner-api > > > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-state > > > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-side-inputs-1-pager > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kenn > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:08 AM Etienne Chauchot > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Great that you take this action Alexey !Here are the > > > > > > > > > > > > links I have, there is duplicates with the > > > > > > > > > > > > ones you already received and maybe old docs as well: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MtBZYV7NAcfbwyy9Op8STeFNBxtljxgy69FkHMvhTMA/edithttps://docs > > > > > > > > > > > > .google.com/document/d/1wR56Jef3XIPwj4DFzQKznuGPM3JDfRDVkxzeDlbdVSQ/edithttps://docs.google.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > document/d/1Fl_LM918j7ZxAmCSkm43GBjV8knsZAIA1tRhvJ4DneM/edit#heading=h.1lcfuwfvxg2https://docs.g > > > > > > > > > > > > oogle.com/document/d/1zcF4ZGtq8pxzLZxgD_JMWAouSszIf9LnFANWHKBsZlg/edithttps://docs.google.com/do > > > > > > > > > > > > cument/d/1AQmx-T9XjSi1PNoEp5_L- > > > > > > > > > > > > lT0j7BkgTbmQnc6uFEMI4c/edit#heading=h.dtl8cwoybr2yhttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1u- > > > > > > > > > > > > 4o_0uj8uKa2SVNPBNxIKfvcJ4t66ecCoU1M2yVoDA/edit#heading=h.c1deqkr0bp31https://docs.google.com/doc > > > > > > > > > > > > ument/d/17H2sBEtnoTSxjzlrz7rmKtX5E3F0mW1NpFQzWzSYOpY/edit#heading=h.1lcfuwfvxg2https://docs.goog > > > > > > > > > > > > le.com/document/d/1tnG2DPHZYbsomvihIpXruUmQ12pHGK0QIvXS1FOTgRc/edit#heading=h.puuotbien1gfhttps: > > > > > > > > > > > > //docs.google.com/document/d/1KEtUPE5d6oCZFvFlR7PtSDvHpx5kDj2dTlIxF7UXa5w/edit#heading=h.p6lvszf > > > > > > > > > > > > bmyj6https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IGduUqmhWDi_69l9nG8kw73HZ5WI5wOps9Tshl5wpQA/edit#headin > > > > > > > > > > > > g=h.gh88g5y0rekphttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1NehB__CxJTmjxkt7hDYIJWNDLJyEoE0b- > > > > > > > > > > > > AUJvInHPCI/edit#heading=h.gh88g5y0rekphttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOozW0bzBuz4oHJEuZNDOH > > > > > > > > > > > > dzaV5Y56ix58Ozrqm2jFg/edit#heading=h.gh88g5y0rekphttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1XYzb1Fnt2sa > > > > > > > > > > > > m7u2MsGFaZp-2qSIGxUn66VLer- > > > > > > > > > > > > bcXAk/edit#heading=h.p6lvszfbmyj6https://docs.google.com/document/d/1voyUIQ2DrWkoY- > > > > > > > > > > > > BsJwM8YvF4gGKB76CDG8BYL8XBc7A/edit#heading=h.vv2fbulkp7t > > > > > > > > > > > > Etienne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le jeudi 24 mai 2018 à 14:53 +0200, Alexey Romanenko a > > > > > > > > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you everybody for positive feedback and sending > > > > > > > > > > > > > me links to design docs. I’m going to > > > > > > > > > > > > > complete the full list and create PR for review. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Griselda > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps, it was a bit of misunderstanding here, let > > > > > > > > > > > > > me explain what I assume under creating of > > > > > > > > > > > > > such page. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, for now I’m going to collect all known > > > > > > > > > > > > > design docs under one umbrella (the page on > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beam web site) to make it easy to discover. For > > > > > > > > > > > > > example, as a new contributor, I’d like to > > > > > > > > > > > > > know more details what was initial design of new > > > > > > > > > > > > > FileIO, SDF, Metrics, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not going to copy the content of this docs to one > > > > > > > > > > > > > page or even web site, let’s keep this > > > > > > > > > > > > > as it is, no changes here for the moment. I think, > > > > > > > > > > > > > moving to something else than Google docs > > > > > > > > > > > > > is a tough question and requires another discussion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, in this case, this task seems not so hard since > > > > > > > > > > > > > we don’t add such docs too often - I'll > > > > > > > > > > > > > just have to update this index page on web site. In > > > > > > > > > > > > > addition, the authors will be always > > > > > > > > > > > > > welcomed to update this page by themselves. In my > > > > > > > > > > > > > turn, I’ll try to keep an eye on this to > > > > > > > > > > > > > keep it synced. And of course, any help will be > > > > > > > > > > > > > welcomed too =) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WBR, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alexey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 24 May 2018, at 00:01, Griselda Cuevas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Alexey, I think this is a great idea, I'd like to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understand more of the motivation behind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having all the designs doc under a single page. In > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my opinion it could become a challenge to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maintain a page, so knowing what you want to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accomplish could help us think of alternative > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solutions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 23 May 2018 at 14:08, Daniel Oliveira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 to web site page (not Google Doc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely agree that a common entry point would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be excellent. I don't like the idea of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Google Doc so much because it's not very good > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for having changes reviewed and keeping > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > track of who added what, unlike Github. Adding an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entry to the list in the website would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > require reviews and leave behind a commit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > history, which I think is important for an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > authoritative source like this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: I also have a doc I proposed that I didn't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see in the lists: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-runner-api-combine-model > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:52 PM Lukasz Cwik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1, Thanks for picking this up Alexey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:41 AM Huygaa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Batsaikhan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1. That is great, Alexey. Robin and I are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > working on documenting some missing pieces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Java SDK. We will let you know when we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > create polished documents. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 9:28 AM Ismaël Mejía > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 and thanks for volunteering for this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alexey. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We really need to make this more accesible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:00 PM Alexey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Romanenko <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joseph, Eugene - thank you very much for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the links! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All, regarding one common entry point for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all design documents. Could we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just have a dedicated page on Beam web site > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with a list of links to every > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > proposed document? Every entry (optionally) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > might contain, in addition, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > short abstract and list of author(s). In > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this case, it would be easily > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > searchable and available for those who are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > interested in this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the same time, using a Google doc for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > writing/discussing the documents > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seems more than reasonable since it’s quite > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > native and easy to use. I only > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > propose to have a common entry point to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fall of them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If this idea looks feasible, I’d propose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > myself to collect the links to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > already created documents, create such page > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and update this list in the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WBR, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alexey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 22 May 2018, at 21:34, Eugene > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kirpichov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Making it easier to manage indeed would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be good. Could someone from PMC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > please add the following documents of mine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SDF related documents: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/splittable-do-fn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/sdf-via-source > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/textio-sdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/beam-watch-transform > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/beam-breaking-fusion > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Non SDF related: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/context-fn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://s.apache.org/fileio-write > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A suggestion: maybe we can establish a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > convention to send design document > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > proposals to [email protected]? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does the Apache mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > management software support this kind of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stuff? Then they'd be quite easy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to find and filter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:57 AM Kenneth > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Knowles <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> It is owned by the Beam PMC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> collectively. Any PMC member can add > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> things > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to it. Ideas for making it easy to manage > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Probably easier to have a markdown file > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> somewhere with a list of docs so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we can issue and review PRs. Not sure the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > web site is the right place for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it - we have a history of porting docs to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > markdown but really that is high > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > overhead and users/community probably don't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gain from it so much. Some have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggested a wiki. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Kenn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:22 AM Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Wegner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks for the links. Any details on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> that Google drive folder? Who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > maintains it? Is it possible for any > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contributor to add their design doc? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:15 AM Joseph > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> PENG <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Alexey, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> I do not know where you can find all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> design docs, but I know a blog > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that has collected some of the major design > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > docs. Hope it helps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> https://wtanaka.com/beam/design-doc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B-IhJZh9Ab52OFBVZHpsNjc4eXc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:28 AM Alexey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Romanenko < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Is it possible to obtain somewhere a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> list of all proposals / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > prototype documents that have been > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > published as a technical / design > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > documents for new features? I have links to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > only some of them (found in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail list discussions by chance) but I’m > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not aware of others. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> If yes, could someone share it or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> point me out where it is located in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > case if I missed this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> If not, don’t you think it would make > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> sense to have such index of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > these documents? I believe it can be useful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for Beam contributors since > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > these proposals contain information which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is absent or not so detailed on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beam web site documentation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> WBR, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Alexey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
