Hi Beamers,
In the light of the discussion about Beam LTS releases, I'd like to kick
off a thread about how often we upgrade the execution engine of each
Runner. By upgrade, I mean major/minor versions which typically break
the binary compatibility of Beam pipelines.
For the Flink Runner, we try to track the latest stable version. Some
users reported that this can be problematic, as it requires them to
potentially upgrade their Flink cluster with a new version of Beam.
From a developer's perspective, it makes sense to migrate as early as
possible to the newest version of the execution engine, e.g. to leverage
the newest features. From a user's perspective, you don't care about the
latest features if your use case still works with Beam.
We have to please both parties. So I'd suggest to upgrade the execution
engine whenever necessary (e.g. critical new features, end of life of
current version). On the other hand, the upcoming Beam LTS releases will
contain a longer-supported version.
Maybe we don't need to discuss much about this but I wanted to hear what
the community has to say about it. Particularly, I'd be interested in
how the other Runner authors intend to do it.
As far as I understand, with the portability being stable, we could
theoretically upgrade the SDK without upgrading the runtime components.
That would allow us to defer the upgrade for a longer time.
Best,
Max
- [Discuss] Upgrade story for Beam's execution engines Maximilian Michels
-