The MapReduce runner IMHO should not be in the matrix. For the external runners, is there any public documentation available that explains how they can be used and how they are supported?
Thanks, Thomas On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > You are right Tim. > > M/R runner is on a branch (in stale for now to be honest ;)). > > I think I got Max's remark. > > So, agree to focus only Beam coverage in the runner compatibility > matrix. However, it's also important for the community to have some > insights about runners generally speaking. > > Regards > JB > > On 21/09/2018 14:00, Tim Robertson wrote: > > "what do you think about limiting the matrix to Runners in the Beam code > > base" > > > > +1 but perhaps we should having a table listing Runners under > > development like we do for IOs. > > > > As a concrete example we have MapReduce listed in the matrix [1], a page > > documenting it [2] stating it is in Beam 2.6.0 but unless I'm mistaken > > the code exists only on a branch [3] and hasn't been touched for a > while. > > > > Thanks, > > Tim > > > > [1] https://beam.apache.org/documentation/runners/capability-matrix/ > > [2] https://beam.apache.org/documentation/runners/mapreduce/ > > [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/mr-runner > > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 1:37 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hi Max, > > > > not sure I fully follow you there. You mean that we would have kind > of > > compability matrix on dedicated page of each runner ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 21/09/2018 10:57, Maximilian Michels wrote: > > > Hi Beamers, > > > > > > There have been occasions where people asked me about Runner XY > and I > > > had to find out that it only exists in the compatibility matrix, > > but not > > > as part of our code base. More interestingly, I couldn't even find > its > > > code or documentation via my favorite search engine. > > > > > > This seems to be the case for multiple Runners in the matrix. > > > > > > The compatibility matrix will need an overhaul anyways with the > > > portability changes, but what do you think about limiting the > > matrix to > > > Runners in the Beam code base? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Max > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
