Thank you for fixing this, Scott. I also can confirm that it works for me now.

> On 2 Jan 2019, at 22:36, Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Scott, I just tested and the errors I found are fixed and
> everything seems to work now. Snapshots are being correctly updated
> too.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 6:19 PM Scott Wegner <sc...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, I believe this will be fixed with the vendoring release.
>> 
>> I am back from the holidays now and ready to pick this up.
>> 
>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 10:56 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks Andrew for the info.
>>> I think things can wait a bit considering the time of the year, I just
>>> wanted to raise awareness about the issue.
>>> I suppose that we can wait, it should not be long before the vendoring
>>> release is done and this will fix this if I understood correctly.
>>> If anyone else is blocked on this please contact and we will revert
>>> it, otherwise I suppose we can do this revert locally (as Gleb
>>> mentioned) in the meantime.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 6:24 PM Andrew Pilloud <apill...@google.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6282
>>>> 
>>>> Kenn (and everyone else who has context on this change) are out this week, 
>>>> so I don't think anyone is making progress on it. Is this something that 
>>>> can wait a week or two? If not we should revert 
>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7324
>>>> 
>>>> Andrew
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 9:07 AM Gleb Kanterov <g...@spotify.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I can reproduce this on my machine, and reverting 
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7324 fixed the problem. There is a 
>>>>> separate thread in dev@ about releasing vendored gRPC v0.2, I'm wondering 
>>>>> if it will this issue.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 5:20 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Looks like snapshots are broken again since 20 december, can somebody 
>>>>>> PTAL?
>>>>>> Seems like some part of the vendoring could be related to this failure
>>>>>> (maybe it is looking for the unpublished version)?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Running some tests in one existing application I found this
>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
>>>>>> elapsed: 0.447 s <<< FAILURE! - in SerializationTest
>>>>>> [ERROR] nonSerilizableTest(SerializationTest)  Time elapsed: 0.028 s  
>>>>>> <<< ERROR!
>>>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>> org/apache/beam/vendor/grpc/v1p13p1/com/google/protobuf/ProtocolMessageEnum
>>>>>>    at SerializationTest.nonSerilizableTest(SerializationTest.java:27)
>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>>> org.apache.beam.vendor.grpc.v1p13p1.com.google.protobuf.ProtocolMessageEnum
>>>>>>    at SerializationTest.nonSerilizableTest(SerializationTest.java:27)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:13 AM Mark Liu <mark...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Looks like the recent failure (like this job) is related to 
>>>>>>> ':beam-sdks-python:test' change introduced in this PR. `./gradlew 
>>>>>>> :beam-sdks-python:test` can reproduce the error.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Testing a fix in PR7273.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 8:31 AM Yifan Zou <yifan...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Beam9 is offline right now. But, the job also failed on beam4 and 13 
>>>>>>>> with "Could not determine the dependencies of task 
>>>>>>>> ':beam-sdks-python:test.".
>>>>>>>> Seems like the task dependency did not setup properly.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 2:03 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You are right it seems that it was related to beam9 (wondering if it
>>>>>>>>> was bad luck that it was always assigned to beam9 or we can improve
>>>>>>>>> that poor balancing error).
>>>>>>>>> However it failed again today against beam13 maybe this time is just a
>>>>>>>>> build issue but seems related to python too.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 7:33 PM Boyuan Zhang <boyu...@google.com> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Seems like, all failed jobs are not owing to the single task 
>>>>>>>>>> failure. There failed task were executed on beam9, which was 
>>>>>>>>>> rebooted yesterday because python tests failed continuously. +Yifan 
>>>>>>>>>> Zou may have more useful content here.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 9:10 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> It seems that Beam snapshots are broken since Dec. 2
>>>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Beam/job/beam_Release_Gradle_NightlySnapshot/
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> It seems "The :beam-website:startDockerContainer task failed."
>>>>>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Gleb
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Got feedback? tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback

Reply via email to