Since it is primarily for testing, how about just making it use the existing one in the pipeline options? I'm honestly a bit lost as to what the use case was when that was introduced, versus waiting for termination and running the assertion more directly. Can you enlighten me?
Kenn On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:15 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I want to use DirectRunner for a new IT I'm writing, since it's testing > I/O code that's runner agnostic. The problem is that DirectRunner doesn't > have a TestDataflowRunner analog, so features like OnSuccessMatcher aren't > available. > > Any objections to adding a TestDirectRunner class? >
