That's cool! Thank you for working on this. --Mikhail
Have feedback <http://go/migryz-feedback>? On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:49 AM Mark Liu <mark...@google.com> wrote: > Sorry for missing this thread in my inbox. > > Yes, I'm actively working on pull/7675 > <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7675> which works pretty well and is > under review. At first, I tried detox but the test console output are all > mixed together which makes debugging extremely hard. We also lost many > advantages of Gradle and scan UI with detox. > > pull/7675 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7675> use Gradle > parallelism and run tox tasks in there. > https://scans.gradle.com/s/f3fkqqmiosejm is an example run. > > Mark > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 8:19 AM Robbe Sneyders <robbe.sneyd...@ml6.eu> > wrote: > >> Yes, this is largely due to the addition of Python 3 test suites. >> >> Running tests in parallel is actively being investigated by +Mark Liu >> <mark...@google.com> in this Jira ticket [1] and this PR [2]. We will >> add other Python 3.6 and 3.7 test suites only to postcommit until then. >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6527 >> [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7675 >> >> Kind regards, >> Robbe >> >> [image: https://ml6.eu] <https://ml6.eu/> >> >> * Robbe Sneyders* >> >> ML6 Gent >> <https://www.google.be/maps/place/ML6/@51.037408,3.7044893,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c37161feeca14b:0xb8f72585fdd21c90!8m2!3d51.037408!4d3.706678?hl=nl> >> >> M: +32 474 71 31 08 >> >> >> On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 20:22, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Perhaps this is the duplication of all (or at least most) previously >>> existing tests for running under Python 3. I agree that this is excessive; >>> we should probably split out Py2, Py3, and the linters into separate >>> targets. >>> >>> We could look into using detox or retox to parallelize the testing as >>> well. (The issue last time was suppression of output on timeout, but that >>> can be worked around by adding timeouts to the individual tox targets.) >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:26 PM Mikhail Gryzykhin <mig...@google.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> Seems that our python pre-commits grow up in time really fast >>>> <http://104.154.241.245/d/_TNndF2iz/pre-commit-test-latency?orgId=1&from=now-6M&to=now> >>>> . >>>> >>>> Did anyone follow trend or know what are the biggest changes that >>>> happened with python lately? >>>> >>>> I don't see a single jump, but duration of pre-commits almost doubled >>>> since new year. >>>> >>>> [image: image.png] >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> --Mikhail >>>> >>>> Have feedback <http://go/migryz-feedback>? >>>> >>>
