Hi, I agree that checking Nexmark  should be a mandatory task of the release 
process, I think it is already mentioned in
the spreadsheet. Indeed it detects both functional and performances regressions 
and on all the beam model scope.The only
lacking things in Nexmark are with 2 runners:- gearpump is not integrated 
because streaming pipelines (there is no batch
mode) never end (timeout in awaitTermination is not respected)- spark runner in 
streaming mode is not integrated for the
same reason

Etienne

Le mardi 23 avril 2019 à 15:02 -0700, Andrew Pilloud a écrit :
> It looks like Java Nexmark tests are on the validation sheet but we've missed 
> it the last few releases. Thanks for
> checking it Etienne! Does the current release process require everything to 
> be tested before making the release final?
> I fully agree with you on point 2. All of these issues were in RC1 and could 
> have been fixed for RC2.
> 
> Andrew
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:58 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> > Thank you Andrew. I will suggest two improvements to the release process:1. 
> > We can include benchmarks in the
> > validation sheet ("Apache Beam Release Acceptance Criteria"). They are used 
> > part of the validation process and we
> > can ensure that we check those for each release.
> > 2. For RC validation, we can continue to exhaustively validate each RC even 
> > after the first -1 vote. Otherwise we
> > end up with not discovering all issues in a given RC and find them a  
> > successive RC, increasing the number of
> > iterations required.
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:11 PM Andrew Pilloud <apill...@google.com> wrote:
> > > Please consider the vote for RC4 canceled. I'll quickly follow up with a 
> > > new RC.
> > > Thanks for the complete testing everyone!
> > > Andrew
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:06 PM Reuven Lax <re...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > -1 
> > > > we need to cherry pick pr/8325 and pr/8385 to fix the above issue
> > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:48 PM Andrew Pilloud <apill...@google.com> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > I believe the breakage of Nexmark on Dataflow is 
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7002, which went
> > > > > in before the release was cut. It looks like this might be a release 
> > > > > blocker based on the fix: 
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8325.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The degraded performance is after the release is cut, so we should be 
> > > > > good there.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 8:44 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Etienne RC1 vote happened in 04/03 and there have not been any 
> > > > > > cherry
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > picks on the spark runner afterwards so if there is a commit that
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > degraded performance around 04/10 it is not part of the release we 
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > voting, so please consider reverting your -1.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > However the issue you are reporting looks important, from a quick 
> > > > > > look
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I am guessing it could be related to BEAM-5775 that was merged on
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 12/04 however the performance regressions started happening since
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 09/04 so it could be unrelated. Maybe it could be due to changes in
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > our infrastructure. Maybe the change in the workers to be tracked, 
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > definitely not a release blocker at least for the Spark runner.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:12 PM Etienne Chauchot 
> > > > > > <echauc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hi guys ,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I will vote -1 (binding) on this RC (although degradation is 
> > > > > > > before RC4 cut date). I took a look at
> > > > > > Nexmark graphs for the 3 major runners :
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > - there seem to have functional regressions on Dataflow: 
> > > > > > https://apache-beam-testing.appspot.com/explore?dashboard=5647201107705856
> > > > > >  . 13 queries fail in batch mode
> > > > > > starting on 04/17
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > - there is a perf degradation (+200%) in spark runner starting on 
> > > > > > > 04/10 for all the queries: 
> > > > > > https://apache-beam-testing.appspot.com/explore?dashboard=5138380291571712
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Sorry Andrew for the added work
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Etienne
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Le lundi 22 avril 2019 à 12:21 -0700, Andrew Pilloud a écrit :
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I signed the wheels files and updated the build process to not 
> > > > > > > require giving travis apache credentials.
> > > > > > (You should probably change your password if you haven't already.)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:18 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Verified the python 2 wheel files with quick start examples.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:26 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I built the wheel files. They are in the usual place along with 
> > > > > > > other python artifacts. I will test them a
> > > > > > bit and update here. Could someone else please try the wheel files 
> > > > > > as well?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Andrew, could you sign and hash the wheel files?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:11 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I verified
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > - signatures and hashes.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  - python streaming quickstart guide
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I would like to verify the wheel files before voting. Please let 
> > > > > > > us know when they are ready. Also, if you
> > > > > > need help with building wheel files I can help/build.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Ahmet
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:33 AM Maximilian Michels 
> > > > > > > <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Found a minor bug while testing, but not a blocker:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7128
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Max
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On 20.04.19 23:02, Pablo Estrada wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Ran SQL postcommit, and Dataflow Portability Java 
> > > > > > > > validatesrunner tests.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > -P.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> > > > > > > > <j...@nanthrax.net
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     +1 (binding)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     Quickly checked with beam-samples.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     Regards
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     JB
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     On 16/04/2019 00:50, Andrew Pilloud wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for 
> > > > > > > > the version
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > 2.12.0, as follows:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide 
> > > > > > > > specific comments)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > The complete staging area is available for your review, 
> > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     includes:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > <http://dist.apache.org> [2], which is signed with the 
> > > > > > > > key with
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > fingerprint 9E7CEC0661EFD610B632C610AE8FE17F9F8AE3D4 [3],
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central 
> > > > > > > > Repository [4],
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > * source code tag "v2.12.0-RC4" [5],
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > * website pull request listing the release [6], 
> > > > > > > > publishing the API
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > * Java artifacts were built with Gradle/5.2.1 and 
> > > > > > > > OpenJDK/Oracle JDK
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > 1.8.0_181.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source 
> > > > > > > > release to the
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> 
> > > > > > > > <http://dist.apache.org>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     [2].
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.12.0 release to help 
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     validation
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [9].
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is 
> > > > > > > > adopted by
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     majority
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > Thanks,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > Andrew
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > 1]
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     
> > > > > > > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12344944
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.12.0/
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [4]
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     
> > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1068/
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.12.0-RC4
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8215
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/588
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8314
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >      > [9]
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     
> > > > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1007316984
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     --
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >     Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 

Reply via email to