See how the hdfs IT already avoids tag collisions. On Thu, Jun 27, 2019, 20:42 Yichi Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> for flakiness I guess a tag is needed to separate concurrent build apart. > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 8:39 PM Yichi Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> maybe a cron job on jenkins node that does docker prune every day? >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 6:58 PM Ankur Goenka <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This highlights the race condition caused by using single docker >>> registry on a machine. >>> If 2 tests create "jenkins-docker-apache.bintray.io/beam/python" one >>> after another then the 2nd one will replace the 1st one and cause flakyness. >>> >>> Is their a way to dynamically create and destroy docker repository on a >>> machine and clean all the relevant data? >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 3:15 PM Yifan Zou <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The problem was because of the large quantity of stale docker images >>>> generated by the Python portable tests and HDFS IT. >>>> >>>> Dumping the docker disk usage gives me: >>>> >>>> TYPE TOTAL ACTIVE SIZE >>>> RECLAIMABLE >>>> *Images 1039 356 424GB >>>> 384.2GB (90%)* >>>> Containers 987 2 2.042GB >>>> 2.041GB (99%) >>>> Local Volumes 126 0 392.8MB >>>> 392.8MB (100%) >>>> >>>> REPOSITORY >>>> TAG IMAGE ID CREATED >>>> SIZE SHARED SIZE UNIQUE SIZE CONTAINERS >>>> jenkins-docker-apache.bintray.io/beam/python3 >>>> latest ff1b949f4442 22 hours ago 1.639GB >>>> 922.3MB 716.9MB 0 >>>> jenkins-docker-apache.bintray.io/beam/python >>>> latest 1dda7b9d9748 22 hours ago 1.624GB >>>> 913.7MB 710.3MB 0 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> 05458187a0e3 22 hours ago >>>> 732.9MB 625.1MB 107.8MB 4 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> 896f35dd685f 23 hours ago >>>> 1.639GB 922.3MB 716.9MB 0 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> db4d24ca9f2b 23 hours ago >>>> 1.624GB 913.7MB 710.3MB 0 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> 547df4d71c31 23 hours ago >>>> 732.9MB 625.1MB 107.8MB 4 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> dd7d9582c3e0 23 hours ago >>>> 1.639GB 922.3MB 716.9MB 0 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> 664aae255239 23 hours ago >>>> 1.624GB 913.7MB 710.3MB 0 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> b528fedf9228 23 hours ago >>>> 732.9MB 625.1MB 107.8MB 4 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> 8e996f22435e 25 hours ago >>>> 1.624GB 913.7MB 710.3MB 0 >>>> hdfs_it-jenkins-beam_postcommit_python_verify_pr-818_test latest >>>> 24b73b3fec06 25 hours ago 1.305GB >>>> 965.7MB 339.5MB 0 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> 096325fb48de 25 hours ago >>>> 732.9MB 625.1MB 107.8MB 2 >>>> jenkins-docker-apache.bintray.io/beam/java >>>> latest c36d8ff2945d 25 hours ago 685.6MB >>>> 625.1MB 60.52MB 0 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> 11c86ebe025f 26 hours ago >>>> 1.639GB 922.3MB 716.9MB 0 >>>> <none> >>>> <none> 2ecd69c89ec1 26 hours ago >>>> 1.624GB 913.7MB 710.3MB 0 >>>> hdfs_it-jenkins-beam_postcommit_python_verify-8590_test latest >>>> 3d1d589d44fe 2 days ago 1.305GB >>>> 965.7MB 339.5MB 0 >>>> hdfs_it-jenkins-beam_postcommit_python_verify_pr-801_test latest >>>> d1cc503ebe8e 2 days ago 1.305GB >>>> 965.7MB 339.2MB 0 >>>> hdfs_it-jenkins-beam_postcommit_python_verify-8577_test latest >>>> 8582c6ca6e15 3 days ago 1.305GB >>>> 965.7MB 339.2MB 0 >>>> hdfs_it-jenkins-beam_postcommit_python_verify-8576_test latest >>>> 4591e0948170 3 days ago 1.305GB >>>> 965.7MB 339.2MB 0 >>>> hdfs_it-jenkins-beam_postcommit_python_verify-8575_test latest >>>> ab181c49d56e 4 days ago 1.305GB >>>> 965.7MB 339.2MB 0 >>>> hdfs_it-jenkins-beam_postcommit_python_verify-8573_test latest >>>> 2104ba0a6db7 4 days ago 1.305GB >>>> 965.7MB 339.2MB 0 >>>> ... >>>> <1000+ images> >>>> >>>> I removed unused the images and the beam15 is back now. >>>> >>>> Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7650. >>>> Ankur, I assigned the issue to you. Feel free to reassign it if needed. >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> Yifan >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:29 AM Yifan Zou <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Something were eating the disk. Disconnected the worker so jobs could >>>>> be allocated to other nodes. Will look deeper. >>>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>>>> /dev/sda1 485G 485G 96K 100% / >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:54 AM Yifan Zou <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:17 AM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Opened a bug here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7648 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can someone investigate what's going on? >>>>>>> >>>>>>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
