+1 LGTM On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:54 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions. > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote: > >> I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process, my >> question might be trivial to someone actually performing the release. >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release process as >>> discussed[1] and documented[2]. >>> >>> Please vote as follows: >>> +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process >>> -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ... >>> >>> Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday schedule, I'll >>> try to close the vote and tally the results on July 9th so please vote >>> before then. >>> >>> 1: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>> 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts >>> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature