+1 LGTM

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:54 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:

> Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions.
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process, my
>> question might be trivial to someone actually performing the release.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release process as
>>> discussed[1] and documented[2].
>>>
>>> Please vote as follows:
>>> +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process
>>> -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ...
>>>
>>> Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday schedule, I'll
>>> try to close the vote and tally the results on July 9th so please vote
>>> before then.
>>>
>>> 1:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>> 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts
>>>
>>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to