+1 (binding) I validated the signatures against the key dist/release/KEYS and hashes of the source distributions and release artifacts. I also ran some of the quickstarts for Java.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 3:59 PM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> wrote: > +1 > > I've installed from the source in apache/dist. > I've run unit tests in Python 3.6, and wordcount in Python 3.6 in Direct > and Dataflow runners. > > Thanks! > -P. > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:41 AM Hannah Jiang <hannahji...@google.com> > wrote: > >> Yes, I agree this is a separate topic and shouldn't block 2.15 release. >> There is already a JIRA ticket, I will update it with more details. >> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:32 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:18 AM Yifan Zou <yifan...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> This is a friendly reminder. Please help to review, verify and vote on >>>> the release candidate #2 for the version 2.15.0. >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>>> >>>> I've verified Java quickstart & mobile games, and Python (both tar and >>>> wheel) quickstart with Py27, 35, 36, 37. They worked well. >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit?pli=1#gid=1036192804 >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> Yifan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:33 AM Hannah Jiang <hannahji...@google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> A side note about this test: >>>>> Now we only have py2 and py35, so it only fails with py35. I am >>>>> introducing minor versions, which will add py36 and py37, and all py3 are >>>>> flaky. >>>>> It's really difficult to pass Portable Precommit with minor versions, >>>>> the chance of passing the test is around 15%. >>>>> >>>> >>> Hannah, let's separate this from the release thread. Is there a JIRA for >>> this, could you update it? And perhaps we need different pre commits for >>> different versions so that flakes do not stack up. Even if a suite is >90% >>> reliable, if we stack up with 4 version, the reliability will get much >>> lower. >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 5:27 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. Unless there are any objects, let's continue with >>>>>> validating RC2. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 5:21 PM Kyle Weaver <kcwea...@google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not sure if it's worth blocking the release, since I can't >>>>>>> reproduce the issue on my machine and a fix would be hard to verify. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kyle Weaver | Software Engineer | github.com/ibzib | >>>>>>> kcwea...@google.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:56 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kyle, are you currently working on this to decide whether it is the >>>>>>>> blocking case or not? Also is this affecting both release branch and >>>>>>>> master >>>>>>>> branch? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:49 PM Kyle Weaver <kcwea...@google.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Re BEAM-7993: For some context, there are two possible causes >>>>>>>>> here. The pessimistic take is that Dockerized SDK workers are taking >>>>>>>>> forever to start. The optimistic take is that the Docker containers >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> just longer than normal (but not forever) to start on Jenkins, in >>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>> case this issue is nothing new to this release. (The halting >>>>>>>>> problem!) If >>>>>>>>> it's the second, it's safe to wait to fix it in the next release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kyle Weaver | Software Engineer | github.com/ibzib | >>>>>>>>> kcwea...@google.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:42 PM Yifan Zou <yifan...@google.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mark and Kyle found a py35 portable test which is flaky: >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7993. >>>>>>>>>> I plan to finalize the release this week. Would that be a >>>>>>>>>> blocker? Could we include the fix in 2.16? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:38 PM Yifan Zou <yifan...@google.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've run most of validations and they're all good. >>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit?pli=1#gid=1036192804 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:59 AM Hannah Jiang < >>>>>>>>>>> hannahji...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (resending it to dev@) >>>>>>>>>>>> +1, I tested some test cases as well as customized test cases >>>>>>>>>>>> and all looks good. I updated validation sheet. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:40 AM Hannah Jiang < >>>>>>>>>>>> hannahji...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, I tested some test cases as well as customized test cases >>>>>>>>>>>>> and all looks good. I updated validation sheet. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:28 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please help with validation and voting on the RC2. Let's help >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yifan to finalize this release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahmet >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:27 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.15.0, release candidate #2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev <dev@beam.apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, verified a few python workloads and updated the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> validation sheet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Yifan! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:49 AM Yifan Zou < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yifan...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 2.15.0, as follows: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which includes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The official Apache source release to be deployed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint AC9DB4F14CC90F37080F2C5B6D18F9A7F8DA25E1 [3]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Repository [4]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Source code tag "v2.15.0-RC2" [5]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Website pull request listing the release [6], publishing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release to the dist.apache.org [2]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.15.0 release to help >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with validation [9]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yifan Zou >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12345489 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.15.0/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1082/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1082/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.15.0-RC2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9341 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/592 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9346 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [9] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit?pli=1#gid=1036192804 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "datapls-plat-team" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to datapls-plat-team+unsubscr...@google.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/google.com/d/msgid/datapls-plat-team/CAO_Zxo1G89_ET0y3Gpkeu7v5PJJSZMK6n%2BXBG%2BSkkVeE-09Ptg%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/google.com/d/msgid/datapls-plat-team/CAO_Zxo1G89_ET0y3Gpkeu7v5PJJSZMK6n%2BXBG%2BSkkVeE-09Ptg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
