+1 On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 2:04 PM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> wrote:
> +1 > > verified sha1 and md5 hashes. > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:28 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I validated that no classes appeared outside of the >> org.apache.beam.vendor.grpc.v1p26p0 namespace and I also validated that the >> linkage checker listed no potential linkage errors. >> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:25 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Please review the release of the following artifacts that we vendor: >>> * beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0 >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.1, >>> as follows: >>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> >>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: >>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org >>> [1], which is signed with the key with >>> fingerprint EAD5DE293F4A03DD2E77565589E68A56E371CCA2 [2], >>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3], >>> * commit hash "e60d49bdf1ed85e8f3efa1da784227f381a9e085" [4], >>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority >>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Release Manager >>> >>> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/vendor/ >>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >>> [3] >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1089/ >>> [4] >>> https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/e60d49bdf1ed85e8f3efa1da784227f381a9e085 >>> >>
