+1 for dropping 1.7, once we have 1.10 support ready D.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:01 PM <je...@seznam.cz> wrote: > Hi Ismael, > yes, sure. The proposal would be to have snapshot dependency in the > feature branch. The snapshot must be changed to release before merge to > master. > Jan > > Dne 18. 2. 2020 17:55 napsal uživatel Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com>: > > Just to be sure, you mean Flink 1.11.0-SNAPSHOT ONLY in the next branch > dependency? > We should not have any SNAPSHOT dependency from other projects in Beam. > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 5:34 PM <je...@seznam.cz> wrote: > > Hi=Cr�Jincheng, > I think there should be a "process" for this. I would propose to: > a) create new branch with support for new (snapshot) flink - currently > that would mean flink 1.11 > b) as part of this brach drop support for all version up to N - 3 > I think th!t that dropping all versions and adding new version should be > atomic, otherwise we risk we release beam version with less than three > supprted flink versions. > I'd suggest to start with the 1.10 branch support, include the drop of 1.7 > into that branch. Once 1.10 gets merged, we should create 1.11 with > snapshot dependency to be able to keep up with the release cadence of flink. > WDYT? > Jan > > Dne 18. 2. 2020 15:34 napsal uživatel jincheng sun < > sunjincheng...@gmail.com>: > > Hi folks, > > Apache Flink 1.10 has completed the release announcement [1]n Then we > would like to add Flink 1.10 build target and make Flink Runner compatible > with Flink 1.10 [2]. So, I would suggest that at most three versions of > Flink runner for Apache Beam community according to the update Policy of > Apache Flink releases [3] , i.e. I think it's better to maintain the three > versions of 1.8/1.9/1.10 after add Flink 1.10 build target to Flink runner. > > The current existence of Flink runner 1.7 will affect the upgrade of Flink > runner 1.8x and 1.9x due to the code of Flink 1.7 is too old, more detail > can be found in [4]. So, we need to drop the support of Flink runner 1.7 > as soon as possible. > > This discussion also CC to @User, due to the change will affect our users. > And I would appreciate it if you could review the PR [5]. > > Welcome any feedback! > > Best, > Jincheng > > [1] > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flin+-1-10-0-released-td37564.html > <http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flink-1-10-0-released-td37564.html> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9295 > [3] https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html#update-policy-for-old-releases > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9299 > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10884 > > > >
