> Now that the vote has passed maybe we should add the images somewhere > in the website so people can easily find the Firefly to use it
+1 Maybe something to revisit after the website overhaul is complete. I filed https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9948 if anyone wants to take it. On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:57 PM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote: > Now that the vote has passed maybe we should add the images somewhere > in the website so people can easily find the Firefly to use it. > Something like what we do with our logos > https://beam.apache.org/community/logos/ > > WDYT? any taker? > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 7:43 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'll be happy to as well! > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 4:18 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hey Maria, > >> > >> I can testify :) > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Max > >> > >> On 23.04.20 20:49, María Cruz wrote: > >> > Hi everyone! > >> > It is amazing to see how this process developed to collaboratively > >> > create Apache Beam's mascot. Thank you to everyone who got involved! > >> > I would like to write a blogpost for the Beam website, and I wanted to > >> > ask you: would anyone like to offer their testimony about the process > of > >> > creating the Beam mascot, and what this means to you? Everyone's > >> > testimony is welcome! If you witnessed the development of a mascot for > >> > another open source project, even better =) > >> > > >> > Please feel free to express interest on this thread, and I'll reach > out > >> > to you off-list. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > María > >> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 6:19 AM Jeff Klukas <[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > > >> > I personally like the sound of "Datum" as a name. I also like the > >> > idea of not assigning them a gender. > >> > > >> > As a counterpoint on the naming side, one of the slide decks > >> > provided while iterating on the design mentions: > >> > > >> > > Mascot can change colors when it is “full of data” or has a > “batch > >> > of data” to process. Yellow is supercharged and ready to process! > >> > > >> > Based on that, I'd argue that the mascot maps to the concept of a > >> > bundle in the beam execution model and we should consider a name > >> > that's a play on "bundle" or perhaps a play on "checkpoint". > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 3:44 PM Julian Bruno < > [email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > While working on the design of our Mascot > >> > Some ideas showed up and I wish to share them. > >> > In regard to Alex Van Boxel's question about the name of our > Mascot. > >> > > >> > I was thinking about this yesterday night and feel it could > be a > >> > great idea to name the Mascot "*Data*" or "*Datum*". Both > names > >> > sound cute and make sense to me. I prefer the later. Datum > means > >> > a single piece of information. The Mascot is the first piece > of > >> > information and its job is to collect batches of data and > >> > process it. Datum is in charge of linking information > together. > >> > > >> > In addition, our Mascot should have no gender. Rendering it > >> > accessible to all users. > >> > > >> > Beam as a name for the mascot is pretty straight forward but I > >> > think there are many things carrying that same name already. > >> > > >> > What do you think? > >> > > >> > Looking forward to hearing your feedback. Names are important > >> > and I feel it can expand the personality and create a cool > >> > background for our Mascot. > >> > > >> > Cheers! > >> > > >> > Julian > >> > > >> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 3:40 PM Kyle Weaver < > [email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > > >> > Beam Firefly is fine with me (I guess people tend to > forget > >> > mascot names anyway). But if anyone comes up with > something > >> > particularly cute/clever we can consider it. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 6:33 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy > >> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > > >> > @Alex, Beam Firefly? > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:57 PM Alex Van Boxel > >> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > > >> > We forgot something.... > >> > > >> > ... > >> > > >> > ... > >> > > >> > it/she/he needs a *name*! > >> > > >> > > >> > _/ > >> > _/ Alex Van Boxel > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 6:19 AM Kenneth Knowles > >> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > > >> > Looking forward to the guide. I enjoy doing > >> > (bad) drawings as a way to relax. And I want > >> > them to be properly on brand :-) > >> > > >> > Kenn > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:35 AM Maximilian > >> > Michels <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > Awesome. What a milestone! The mascot is a > >> > real eye catcher. Thank you > >> > Julian and Aizhamal for making it happen. > >> > > >> > On 06.04.20 22:05, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy > wrote: > >> > > I am happy to announce that this vote > has > >> > passed, with 13 approving +1 > >> > > votes, 5 of which are binding PMC votes. > >> > > > >> > > We have the final design for the Beam > >> > Firefly! Yahoo! > >> > > > >> > > Everyone have a great week! > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:57 AM David > >> > Morávek <[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:51 PM Reza > >> > Rokni <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> > >> > > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > +1(non-binding) > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:24 PM > >> > Alexey Romanenko > >> > > <[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding). > >> > > > >> > > > On 3 Apr 2020, at 14:53, > >> > Maximilian Michels > >> > > <[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > +1 (binding) > >> > > > > >> > > > On 03.04.20 10:33, Jan > >> > Lukavský wrote: > >> > > >> +1 (non-binding). > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On 4/2/20 9:24 PM, Austin > >> > Bennett wrote: > >> > > >>> +1 (nonbinding) > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at > >> > 12:10 PM Luke Cwik > >> > > <[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> > > >>> <mailto: > [email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> +1 (binding) > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 > at > >> > 11:54 AM Pablo Estrada > >> > > <[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> > > >>> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> +1! (binding) > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Apr 2, > 2020 > >> > at 11:19 AM Alex Van Boxel > >> > > >>> < > [email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> > > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> Thanks for > >> > clearing this up Aizhamal. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> +1 (non > binding) > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> _/ > >> > > >>> _/ Alex Van > Boxel > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Apr > 2, > >> > 2020 at 8:14 PM Aizhamal > >> > > Nurmamat kyzy > >> > > >>> > >> > <[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> Good > point, > >> > Alex. Actually Julian and I > >> > > have talked > >> > > >>> about > >> > producing this kind of guide. It > >> > > will be > >> > > >>> delivered > >> > as an additional contribution > >> > > in the follow > >> > > >>> up. We > >> > think this will be a derivative of > >> > > the original > >> > > >>> design, > and > >> > be done after the original is > >> > > officially > >> > > >>> accepted. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> With this > >> > vote, we want to accept the > >> > > Firefly donation > >> > > >>> as > designed > >> > [1], and let Julian produce other > >> > > >>> artifacts > >> > using the official Beam mascot > >> > > later on. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> [1] > >> > > > >> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zK8Cm8lwZ3ALVFpD1aY7TLCVNwlyTS3PXxTV2qQCAbk/edit?usp=sharing > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, > Apr > >> > 2, 2020 at 10:37 AM Alex Van > >> > > Boxel > >> > > >>> > >> > <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> > >> > > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> I > don't > >> > want to be a spoiler... but > >> > > this vote > >> > > >>> feels > >> > like a final deliverable... but > >> > > without a > >> > > >>> style > >> > guide as Kenn originally > >> > > suggested most of > >> > > >>> use > >> > will not be able to adapt the > >> > > design. This > >> > > >>> would > >> > include: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> * > >> > frontal view > >> > > >>> * > >> > side view > >> > > >>> * > >> > back view > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > actually different posses so we can > >> > > mix and match. > >> > > >>> > Without > >> > this it will never reach the > >> > > potential of > >> > > >>> the > Go > >> > gopher or gRPC Pancakes. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> Note > >> > this is *not* a negative vote > >> > > but I'm afraid > >> > > >>> that > >> > the use without a guide will be > >> > > fairly > >> > > >>> > limited > >> > as most of use are not > >> > > designers. Just a > >> > > >>> > concern. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> _/ > >> > > >>> _/ > Alex > >> > Van Boxel > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> On > Thu, > >> > Apr 2, 2020 at 7:27 PM Andrew > >> > > Pilloud > >> > > >>> > >> > <[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> > >> > > >>> > wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > +1, > >> > Accept the donation of the > >> > > Firefly design > >> > > >>> > as > >> > Beam Mascot > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > On > >> > Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:19 AM > >> > > Julian Bruno > >> > > >>> > >> > <[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > > <mailto: > [email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> > > >>> > >> > <mailto:[email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > > <mailto: > [email protected] > >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > Hello Apache Beam Community, > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > Please vote on the acceptance > >> > > of the final > >> > > >>> > >> > design of the Firefly as > >> > > Beam's mascot > >> > > >>> > >> > [1]. Please share your input > >> > > no later than > >> > > >>> > >> > Monday, April 6, at noon > >> > > Pacific Time. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > [ ] +1, Accept the donation > >> > > of the Firefly > >> > > >>> > >> > design as Beam Mascot > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > [ ] -1, Decline the donation > >> > > of the > >> > > >>> > >> > Firefly design as Beam Mascot > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > Vote is adopted by at least 3 > >> > > PMC +1 > >> > > >>> > >> > approval votes, with no PMC > >> > > -1 disapproval > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > votes. Non-PMC votes are > >> > > still encouraged. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > PMC voters, please help by > >> > > indicating your > >> > > >>> > >> > vote as "(binding)" > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > The vote and input phase will > >> > > be open > >> > > >>> > >> > until Monday, April 6, at 12 > >> > > pm Pacific Time. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > Thank you very much for your > >> > > feedback and > >> > > >>> > >> > ideas, > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > Julian > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > [1] > >> > > >>> > >> > > > >> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zK8Cm8lwZ3ALVFpD1aY7TLCVNwlyTS3PXxTV2qQCAbk/edit?usp=sharing > >> > > > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > -- > >> > > >>> > >> > Julian Bruno // Visual Artist > >> > > & Graphic > >> > > >>> > >> > Designer > >> > > >>> > >> > (510) 367-0551 <tel:(510)%20367-0551> > >> > > <tel:(510)%20367-0551> > >> > <tel:(510)%20367-0551> / > >> > > >>> > >> > SF Bay Area, CA > >> > > >>> > >> > www.instagram.com/julbro.art > >> > <http://www.instagram.com/julbro.art> > >> > > > >> > <http://www.instagram.com/julbro.art> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > >> > <http://www.instagram.com/julbro.art> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > >> > >
