Since the current RC has been -1ed maybe we can include BEAM-9887 as
part of the next RC, no?
It is definitely not a blocker but a nice to have.

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:26 AM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com> wrote:
>
> -1, the wheel files seem to be built against the wrong commit. E.g.
>
> unzip -p 
> apache_beam-2.21.0-cp35-cp35m-macosx_10_6_intel.macosx_10_9_intel.macosx_10_9_x86_64.macosx_10_10_intel.macosx_10_10_x86_64.whl
>  apache_beam/runners/worker/bundle_processor.py | head -n 40
>
> notice the missing "import bisect" (among other things) missing from 
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/release-2.21.0/sdks/python/apache_beam/runners/worker/bundle_processor.py.
>
> (I do agree that BEAM-9887 isn't severe enough to hold up the release at this 
> point.)
>
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:48 PM rahul patwari <rahulpatwari8...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Luke,
>>
>> The release is not severely broken without PR #11609.
>> The PR ensures that, while building a Row with Logical Type, the input value 
>> provided is proper. If we take FixedBytes logical type with length 10, for 
>> example, the proper input value will be a byte array of length 10. But, 
>> without this PR, for FixedBytes logical type, the Row will be built with 
>> input value with length less than the expected length.
>> But, as long as the input value provided is correct, there shouldn't be any 
>> problems.
>> I will change the fix version as 2.22.0 for BEAM-9887.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rahul
>>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:51 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rahul, do you believe that the release is severely broken without PR/11609 
>>> enough to require another release candidate or would waiting till 2.22 
>>> (which is due to be cut tomorrow)?
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:13 PM rahul patwari <rahulpatwari8...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Can the PR: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11609 be cherry-picked for 
>>>> 2.21.0 release?
>>>> If not, the fix version has to be changed for BEAM-9887.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Rahul
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:05 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1, I validated python 2 and 3 quickstarts.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 4:57 PM Hannah Jiang <hannahji...@google.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I confirmed that licenses/notices/source code are added to Java and 
>>>>>> Python docker images as expected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 2:36 PM Kyle Weaver <kcwea...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for bringing that up Steve. I'll leave it to others to vote on 
>>>>>>> whether that necessitates an RC #2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:22 PM Steve Niemitz <sniem...@apache.org> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10015 was marked as 2.21 
>>>>>>>> but isn't in the RC1 tag.  It's marked as P1, and seems like the 
>>>>>>>> implication is that without the fix, pipelines can produce incorrect 
>>>>>>>> data.  Is this a blocker?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +Reuven Lax, would this be a release blocker?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kyle Weaver <kcwea...@google.com> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 
>>>>>>>>> 2.21.0, as follows:
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which 
>>>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to 
>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint 
>>>>>>>>> F11E37D7F006D086232876797B6D6673C79AEA72 [3],
>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.21.0-RC1" [5],
>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API 
>>>>>>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.6.3 and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 
>>>>>>>>> 1.8.0.
>>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the 
>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.21.0 release to help with 
>>>>>>>>> validation [9].
>>>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by 
>>>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Kyle
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] 
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12347143
>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.21.0/
>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>>>> [4] 
>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1103/
>>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/releases/tag/v2.21.0-RC1
>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11727
>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/603
>>>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11729
>>>>>>>>> [9] 
>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=275707202
>>>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image

Reply via email to