+1 for 3 too, thanks
> On 16 Jul 2020, at 22:27, David Yan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 for 3.
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:35 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> +1 for 3. Thanks Ning.
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:54 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> +1 for [3]
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:47 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> +1 for [3] as well.
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:40 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Kyle. [3] sounds more accurate.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:00 PM Kyle Weaver <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I prefer [3].
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:53 AM Ning Kang <[email protected]
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> Last week, I sent a design doc and proposals in this email thread about
> >>> creating a JupyterLab extension for Interactive Beam. If you haven't had
> >>> a chance to look at it and you're interested in Interactive Beam, please
> >>> feel free to leave comments.
> >>>
> >>> Let's start a vote for the name of this extension to be used when
> >>> published to NPM.
> >>> Here are some of the candidate names:
> >>> [1] apache-beam-sidepanel
> >>> [2] apache-beam-interactive-sidepanel
> >>> [3] apache-beam-jupyterlab-sidepanel
> >>> [4] <I don't like [1][2][3], my proposal is ${XXX}>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> >>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Ning.
