+1 (non-binding)

Thanks,
Cham

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:26 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:

> +1 - validated py3 quickstarts. The problem I mentioned earlier is
> resolved.
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 7:46 PM Daniel Oliveira <danolive...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Good news: According to
>> https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PostRelease_Python_Candidate/188/consoleFull
>>  the
>> Streaming Wordcount quickstart work for Dataflow with Python 2.7. So it
>> looks like the container issue might be fixed.
>>
>> Bad news: That same Jenkins job failed on "Running HourlyTeamScore
>> example with DirectRunner" because it's missing a --temp_location flag,
>> despite using the DirectRunner. This looks like a bug, but I'm still
>> investigating whether it'll need another cherry-pick and RC to fix or if
>> the validation script just needs to be updated. I'll update the thread if I
>> find anything.
>>
>
> Probably it does not require a cherry-pick. We have not validated that
> workflow in the past few releases.
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:58 PM Daniel Oliveira <danolive...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The Dataflow Python Batch worker issue should be fixed now. I tried
>>> verifying it myself via the rc validation script, but I've been having some
>>> trouble with the GCP authentication so if someone else can validate it,
>>> that would be a big help.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:51 PM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I verified the signatures and all the artifacts are correct, and tested
>>>> a wheel in a fresh virtual environment. It'd be good to see the Dataflow
>>>> issue confirmed as fixed though.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:17 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <valen...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This error comes from the Dataflow Python Batch worker.
>>>>>
>>>>> Streaming workflows use sdk worker, which is provided by apache-beam
>>>>> library, so the versions will match.
>>>>>
>>>>> The error should be fixed by setting the correct Dataflow worker
>>>>> version in Dataflow containers, and does not affect Beam RC.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 4:52 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -1 - I validated py3 quickstarts on dataflow and direct runner. I ran
>>>>>> into 1 issue with batch workflows on dataflow:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "RuntimeError: Beam SDK base version 2.24.0 does not match Dataflow
>>>>>> Python worker version 2.24.0.dev. Please check Dataflow worker
>>>>>> startup logs and make sure that correct version of Beam SDK is 
>>>>>> installed."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems like the batch worker needs to be rebuild. Not sure why the
>>>>>> streaming worker did not fail (does it have the correct version? or does 
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> not have the same check?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahmet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:33 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <
>>>>>> valen...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dataflow containers are also available now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:47 PM Daniel Oliveira <
>>>>>>> danolive...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This should fix the BigQueryIO regression that Pablo caught.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As before, Dataflow containers are not yet ready. I or someone else
>>>>>>>> will chime in on the thread once it's ready.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:39 PM Daniel Oliveira <
>>>>>>>> danolive...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version
>>>>>>>>> 2.24.0, as follows:
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with
>>>>>>>>> fingerprint D0E7B69D911ADA3C0482BAA1C4E6B2F8C71D742F [3],
>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.24.0-RC3" [5],
>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>>>>>>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.6.3 and OpenJDK 1.8.0.
>>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to
>>>>>>>>> the dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.24.0 release to help with
>>>>>>>>> validation [9].
>>>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Release Manager
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12347146
>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.24.0/
>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1110/
>>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.24.0-RC3
>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/12743
>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/607
>>>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/12745
>>>>>>>>> [9]
>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1432428331
>>>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to