On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:02 AM Piotr Szuberski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > A softer approach would be to let it as it is (1.8) and document > > explicitly that we check upwards compatibility with 1.9 and suggest > > users to explicitly override the version if required. > > Ok, thanks! I think it's the better option. > > > > I have not followed your work on the compatibility tests but I am > > curious what is the issue with Avro 1.10? > > AFAIR Avro 1.10 completely removes the support for joda time and for now > Beam makes use of both Avro time interfaces (one of which is removed in > 1.10) > Could you file a jira for this (if we don't have one already)?
