+1 (binding). I've verified the release artifacts and signatures, and
validated some simple pipelines with a freshly installed wheel.

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:00 AM Brian Hulette <bhule...@google.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding). Ran a Python pipeline using DataframeTransform on
> DirectRunner and DataflowRunner (woohoo!)
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 8:48 AM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding). Validated multi-language pipelines for Kafka/SQL.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cham
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 8:41 AM Tyson Hamilton <tyso...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me. I validated Nexmark performance tests.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 7:53 PM Robert Burke <rob...@frantil.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm +1 on RC1 based on the 7 tests I know I can check successfully.
>>>> I'll be trying more tomorrow, but remember that release validation requires
>>>> the community to validate it meets our standards, and I can't do it alone.
>>>>
>>>> Remember you can participate in the release validation by reviewing
>>>> parts of the documentation being published as well, not just by running the
>>>> Pyhton and Java artifacts.
>>>>
>>>>  If you have contributed new python or java docs into this release,
>>>> they'll appear in the to be published docs.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Robert Burke
>>>> 2.26.0 release manager
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 6:25 PM Robert Burke <rob...@frantil.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Turns out no changes required affecting the dataflow artifacts this
>>>>> time around, so Dataflow is cleared for testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>> Robert Burke
>>>>> 2.26.0 Release Manager
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 6:03 PM Robert Burke <r...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Robert Burke <r...@google.com>
>>>>>> Thu, Dec 3, 8:01 PM (4 days ago)
>>>>>> to dev
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>>>>> 2.26.0, as follows:
>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
>>>>>> candidate, and vote +1
>>>>>>  if no issues are found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>>>> A52F5C83BAE26160120EC25F3D56ACFBFB2975E1 [3],
>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.26.0-RC1" [5],
>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>>>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.6.0 and OpenJDK 1.8.0_275.
>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.26.0 release to help with
>>>>>> validation [9].
>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (10th ~6pm PST). It is
>>>>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Robert Burke
>>>>>> 2.26.0 Release Manager
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12348833
>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.26.0/
>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/org apache
>>>>>> beam-1144/
>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.26.0-RC1
>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13481
>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/609
>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13482
>>>>>> [9]
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=475997301
>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS. New Dataflow artifacts likely need to be built and published but
>>>>>> this doesn't block vetting the remainder of the RC at this time. Thank 
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> for your patience.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to