Hi Aspen, if the issue has been fixed on Calcite's side, it is waiting for
an overdue upgrade of the Calcite version Beam uses (tracked by [1]).
Currently Beam depends on Calcite 1.20, and it looks like that issue was
fixed in Calcite 1.21 [2].

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9379
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3237

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:12 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:

> +Andrew Pilloud <[email protected]> +Robin Qiu <[email protected]>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:42 PM Aspen Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello, I have recently encountered an issue with BeamSql queries against
>> complex data structures. See
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11140 for info. Essentially,
>> the query code generation is failing past a certain depth, which is not
>> hard to achieve with subqueries and nested data structures. Is there any
>> chance this issue could be fixed? It seems as though it has been solved on
>> Calcite's side.
>>
>> Aspen Barnes
>> Security Engineer II
>> Pronouns | they/them
>> Etsy
>>
>

Reply via email to