On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:06 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Also I wonder if we now need to clarify both Java 8 and Java 11 versions > separately? > > You mean for the docker images? Otherwise we should not be using Java > 11 at all to produce the artifacts. > Thanks for clarification, yes, looks like Docker images are the only artifacts where this concern applies. The Docker images include several jars[1], that I believe are currently built locally (by a release manager at container image build time). Are the jars included in Java 11 images built with Java 11? If so, is it worth calling out the compiler? Also, perhaps we should look into building release artifacts using Jenkins or Github Actions, with a preconfigured version of compilers, instead of whatever version is installed on the release manager's machine. [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/sdks/java/container/Dockerfile#L24-L33 > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 4:51 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <valen...@google.com> > wrote: > > > > Noting that announcement does not include the version of the Java > compilers used - looks like the release guide still requires it: > > > > * Java artifacts were built with Maven MAVEN_VERSION and OpenJDK/Oracle > JDK JDK_VERSION. > > > > > > Could you please add this info to this thread for posterity? > > > > Also I wonder if we now need to clarify both Java 8 and Java 11 versions > separately? > > > > Other than that, +1 from me. Ran several mobile gaming pipelines on > Direct and Dataflow runners with Python 3.8. > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:49 AM Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (non-binding). > >> > >> I've validated the RC against my dependent projects (mainly Java SDK, > Flink and DirectRunner). > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Jan > >> > >> On 1/7/21 2:15 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote: > >> > >> +1 (binding) - validated python quickstarts. > >> > >> Thank you Pablo. > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:57 PM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> I've built and unit tested existing Dataflow Templates with the new > version. > >>> Best > >>> -P. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:17 PM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi everyone, > >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for the version > 2.27.0, as follows: > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > >>>> > >>>> NOTE. What happened to RC #2? I started building RC2 before > completing all the cherry-picks, so the tag for RC2 was created on an > incorrect commit. > >>>> > >>>> NOTE. What happened to RC #3? I started building RC3, but a new bug > was discovered (BEAM-11569) that required amending the branch. Thus this is > now RC4. > >>>> > >>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release > candidate, and vote +1 > >>>> if no issues are found. > >>>> > >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which > includes: > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1], > >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to > dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint > C79DDD47DAF3808F0B9DDFAC02B2D9F742008494 [3], > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4], > >>>> * source code tag "v2.27.0-RC4" [5], > >>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API > reference manual [7], and the blog post [8]. > >>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the > dist.apache.org [2]. > >>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.27.0 release to help with > validation [9]. > >>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10]. > >>>> > >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, but given the holidays, > we will likely extend for a few more days. The release will be adopted by > majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> -P. > >>>> > >>>> [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349380 > >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.27.0/ > >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS > >>>> [4] > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1149/ > >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.27.0-RC4 > >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13602 > >>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/610 > >>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13603 > >>>> [9] > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=194829106 > >>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image >
