Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12? Unless there are specific objections, makes sense to me.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:29 AM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko....@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 too but are there any potential objections for this? > > On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:21, David Morávek <david.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > D. > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +user >> >> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0? >> >> Sounds like a good idea. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0? >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in >> previous >> >> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three >> releases >> >> [1]. >> >> >> >> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink >> 1.8 and >> >> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring >> the >> >> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone >> has a >> >> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions. >> >> >> >> WDYT? >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Ismael >> >> >> >> [1] >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948 >> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203 >> > >
