The release branch is now passing Jenkins tests: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15431
Thank you all so far for help with release blockers. There are 5 left <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BEAM/versions/12350404>. On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 7:54 AM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko....@gmail.com> wrote: > See my comment below. > > On 26 Aug 2021, at 03:44, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 1:50 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote: > >> I've found 2 performance regressions in IO. Could someone triage these? >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12801 >> > > @Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko....@gmail.com> @Tim Robertson > <timrobertson...@gmail.com> - Could you comment on this? It is related > to HadoopFormatIO. > > > > I don’t see any code changes for “sdks/java/io/hadoop-format” package > since June 2nd while the Write performance dropped at Aug 10th for the > first time. > I’ll try to reproduce it locally with a direct runner but seems it was > caused by something else. Any other ideas about this? > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12800 >> > > @Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com> @Yifan Mai > <yifan...@google.com> - Do you know who could comment on this? > > >> >> >> +14 other blockers currently >> > > I have not looked at the other blockers. It might help to check with the > assignees. They may not know that they are release blockers. > > >> >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:22 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> I'll try cutting the release today. From what I can tell [1], the only >>> perma-reds are python postcommits. >>> >> > I believe this is fixed now. (Thanks to @Kyle Weaver <kcwea...@google.com> > ) > > >> >>> [1] >>> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:12 AM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Please mark 2.33.0 release blockers by setting the "Fix version" field >>>> to 2.33.0. Otherwise, it doesn't appear in the dashboard >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BEAM/versions/12350404>. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 9:32 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +Rui Wang <ruw...@google.com> as the current build monitor. >>>>> >>>>> At the time I did not mean to add any additional tests as it was a >>>>> copy paste error. >>>>> >>>>> I do have another fix for the failing Python PreCommit which I fixed >>>>> since it seemed like a trivial one: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12768 >>>>> - test_df_agg_method_invalid_kwarg_raises too strict on error checking. >>>>> fix >>>>> in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15341 >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 (RecommendationAIIT >>>>> Java Version) >>>>> +Matthias Baetens <baetensmatth...@gmail.com> for the above issue. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 6:54 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thank you Udi and +1 to the release cut on schedule. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:53 PM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It seems as though several tests were broken due to commits during >>>>>>> the issue with some existing flakes. It looks like the Python PostCommit >>>>>>> tests are perma-red due to these failures. So far I'm tracking: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much Luke. Adding bug owners here to explicitly call >>>>>> out release blocking issues. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 (new_block method >>>>>>> missing in pandas) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> +Sam Rohde <sro...@google.com> for the above issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 >>>>>>> (RecommendationAIIT) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> +Matthias Baetens <baetensmatth...@gmail.com> for the above issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12765 (cannot access >>>>>>> field fruit) >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 (Already Exists: >>>>>>> Dataset apache-beam-testing:python_bq_file_loads_) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> +Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> for the two issues above. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12694 >>>>>>> (DICOMIoIntegrationTest) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> +Frank Yang <xiaofranky...@google.com> +Dave Anderson >>>>>> <drander...@google.com> for the DICOMIO. Could one of you look at >>>>>> this? Looks like it might be a simple fix. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 (BQ Already exists >>>>>>> Dataset) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Luke, did you mean link to another issue? This one is a duplicate. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:45 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are the ones that I believe went perma-red due to the issue: >>>>>>>> beam_PostCommit_Python36 >>>>>>>> beam_PostCommit_Python37 >>>>>>>> beam_PostCommit_Python38 >>>>>>>> beam_PreCommit_Python_Cron >>>>>>>> beam_PostCommit_Java >>>>>>>> beam_PostCommit_Java_DataflowV2 >>>>>>>> beam_PreCommit_Java_Examples_Dataflow_Cron >>>>>>>> beam_PostRelease_NightlySnapshot >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:42 AM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sure, I'll verify the status of the tests in our PR template. Any >>>>>>>>> others I should be aware of? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:15 AM Andrew Pilloud < >>>>>>>>> apill...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That sounds reasonable to me. A week should give everyone enough >>>>>>>>>> time to get their changes in. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 9:57 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The issue impacting Dataflow should be resolved. We can see if >>>>>>>>>>> the precommits stabilize by Wednesday. Udi before cutting the first >>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>> can you post what is the status of the testing to the group and if >>>>>>>>>>> it looks >>>>>>>>>>> green then we can go ahead (assuming no blockers)? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 5:47 PM Andrew Pilloud < >>>>>>>>>>> apill...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for volunteering! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to object to the 2.33.0 release being cut until we >>>>>>>>>>>> stabilize our precommits. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Both java and python precommits are reporting the last >>>>>>>>>>>> successful run being in July. >>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Python_Cron/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Java_Examples_Dataflow_Cron/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:36 AM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Beam 2.33.0 release is scheduled to be cut on 2021-08-25 >>>>>>>>>>>>> (Wednesday) and released by 2021-09-29 according to the release >>>>>>>>>>>>> calendar >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If there are no objections then I would like to nominate >>>>>>>>>>>>> myself to do this release. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review your bug list and mark the blockers as blocker >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the release and move non blockers to the next release by >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021-08-25. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Udi >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouani...@group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/Los_Angeles >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
