+Brian Hulette <bhule...@google.com> and +Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> were curious about this effort.
Alex can you elaborate on what happened with GH actions? We can help you figure out the CI story. On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:06 AM Alex Merose <alxrsng...@google.com> wrote: > We had a great meeting last week on this topic! Here is a proposal / > meeting notes doc: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Awj_eNmH-WRSte3bKcCcUlQDiZ5mMKmCO_xV-mHWAak/edit#heading=h.y0pwg4polebc > > Tomorrow, another engineer (https://github.com/cisaacstern) and I are > meeting to create an initial prototype of the Dask runner in the main Beam > repo. Let us know if you'd like to help out in any way. We'll post updates > in this mailing list + the above doc. > > Best, > Alex Merose > > On 2022/06/08 14:22:41 Ryan Abernathey wrote: > > Dear Beamer, > > > > Thank you for all of your work on this amazing project. I am new to Beam > > and am quite excited about its potential to help with some data > processing > > challenges in my field of climate science. > > > > Our community is interested in running Beam on Dask Distributed clusters, > > which we already know how to deploy. This has been discussed at > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5336 and > > https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/18962. It seems technically > feasible. > > > > We are trying to organize a meeting next week to kickstart and coordinate > > this effort. It would be great if we could entrain some Beam maintainers > > into this meeting. If you have interest in this topic and are available > > next week, please share your availability here - > > https://www.when2meet.com/?15861604-jLnA4 > > > > Alternatively, if you have any guidance or suggestions you wish to > provide > > by email or GitHub discussion, we welcome your input. > > > > Thanks again for your open source work. > > > > Best, > > Ryan Abernathey > > >
