Cham, do you remember what was a reason to not finalise that doc? 

Personally, I find having such standards very useful (if they are flexible 
during a time, of course), especially for new developers and PR reviewers, and 
it’d be great to finally have such doc as a part of contribution guide.

—
Alexey  

> On 13 Dec 2022, at 04:32, Chamikara Jayalath via dev <dev@beam.apache.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, I don't think either finalized or documented (in the Website) the 
> previous iteration. This doc seems to contain details from the documents 
> shared in the previous iteration.
> 
> Thanks,
> Cham
> 
>  
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 6:49 PM Robert Burke <rob...@frantil.com 
> <mailto:rob...@frantil.com>> wrote:
>> I think ultimately: until the docs a clearly available on the Beam site 
>> itself, it's not documentation. See also, design docs, previous emails, and 
>> similar.
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 6:07 PM Andrew Pilloud via dev <dev@beam.apache.org 
>> <mailto:dev@beam.apache.org>> wrote:
>>> I believe the previous iteration was here: 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/3o8glwkn70kqjrf6wm4dyf8bt27s52hk
>>> 
>>> The associated docs are:
>>> https://s.apache.org/beam-io-api-standard-documentation
>>> https://s.apache.org/beam-io-api-standard
>>> 
>>> This is missing all the relational stuff that was in those docs, this 
>>> appears to be another attempt starting from the beginning?
>>> 
>>> Andrew
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:57 AM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko....@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:aromanenko....@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> Thanks for writing this!
>>>> 
>>>> IIRC, the similar design doc was sent for review here a while ago. Is this 
>>>> just an updated version and a new one?
>>>> 
>>>> —
>>>> Alexey
>>>> 
>>>>> On 11 Dec 2022, at 15:16, Herman Mak via dev <dev@beam.apache.org 
>>>>> <mailto:dev@beam.apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>> 
>>>>> *TLDR*
>>>>> 
>>>>> Should we adopt a set of standards that Connector I/Os should adhere to? 
>>>>> Attached is a first version of a Beam I/O Standards guideline that 
>>>>> includes opinionated best practices across important components of a 
>>>>> Connector I/O, namely Documentation, Development and Testing. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> *The Long Version*
>>>>> 
>>>>> Apache Beam is a unified open-source programming model for both batch and 
>>>>> streaming. It runs on multiple platform runners and integrates with over 
>>>>> 50 services using individually developed I/O Connectors 
>>>>> <https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/connectors/>. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Given that Apache Beam connectors are written by many different 
>>>>> developers and at varying points in time, they vary in syntax style, 
>>>>> documentation completeness and testing done. For a new adopter of Apache 
>>>>> Beam, that can definitely cause some uncertainty.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So should we adopt a set of standards that Connector I/Os should adhere 
>>>>> to? 
>>>>> Attached is a first version, in Doc format, of a Beam I/O Standards 
>>>>> guideline that includes opinionated best practices across important 
>>>>> components of a Connector I/O, namely Documentation, Development and 
>>>>> Testing. And the aim is to incorporate this into the documentation and to 
>>>>> have it referenced as standards for new Connector I/Os (and ideally have 
>>>>> existing Connectors upgraded over time). If it looks helpful, the 
>>>>> immediate next step is that we can convert it into a .md as a PR into the 
>>>>> Beam repo!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks and looking forward to feedbacks and discussion,
>>>>> 
>>>>>  [PUBLIC] Beam I/O Standards 
>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BCTpSZDUjK90hYZjcn8aAnPd9vuRfj8YU1j3mpSgRwI/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Herman Mak |       Customer Engineer, Hong Kong, Google Cloud |    
>>>>> herman...@google.com <mailto:herman...@google.com> |    +852-3923-5417 
>>>>> <tel:+852%203923%205417>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 

Reply via email to