As we set up the JIRA, I've created a placeholder issue to track interest in a Storm runner: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Taylor, > > In a first time, I would say in Beam (as we do for the other runners). > > Later, when the increase of Beam community and usage, it will make sense > to "move" the runners directly in the target projects (Spark, Flink, Storm, > ...). > > Regards > JB > > > On 02/10/2016 11:55 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > >> Hi Connie, >> >> I've definitely considered it (no implementation yet, just thoughts), and >> would like to start coordinating such an effort. That's one of the reasons >> I wanted to get involved with Beam. >> >> A Storm runner would likely/definitely depend on features in the upcoming >> 1.0 release (namely MillWheel style windowing). That release is currently >> stabilizing, but should be out soon. >> >> The question I have for the Beam community would be where/how to host the >> collaboration effort: Storm, Beam, or a combination? >> >> I'm happy to facilitate with the Storm community/PMC. >> >> -Taylor >> >> On Feb 9, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Yang, Connie <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Beamers, >>> >>> We’re considering adding an Apache Storm Runner to Apache Beam. >>> >>> * Has anyone in the community considered this and started working on >>> this? >>> * If so, what’s the current state? >>> >>> We would like to join the design discussion and development of it if >>> it’s in flight. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Connie >>> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
