On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Dan Halperin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I love the > > name scio. But I think sdks/scala might be most appropriate and would > make > > it a first class citizen for Beam. > > > > I am strongly against it being in the 'sdks/' top-level module -- it's not > a Beam SDK. Unlike DSL, SDK is a very specific term in Beam. > +1. I agree, it is not Beam SDK in that sense. Raghu. > > > Where would a future python sdk reside? > > > > The Python SDK is in the python-sdk branch on Apache already, and it lives > in `sdks/python`. (And it is aiming to become a proper Beam SDK. ;)
