+1 for the notice +1 for the usage of AutoValue On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi team, > > I would like to excuse myself to have forgotten to discuss and share with > you a technical point and generally speaking do a small reminder. > > When we work with Eugene on the JdbcIO, we experimented AutoValue to deal > with IO configuration. AutoValue provides a nice way to reduce and limit > the boilerplate code required by the IO configuration. > We used AutoValue in JdbcIO and, regarding the good improvements we saw, > we started to refactor the other IOs. > > The use of AutoValue should have been notice and discussed on the mailing > list. > > "If it doesn't exist on the mailing list, it doesn't exist at all." > > So, any comment happening on a GitHub pull request, or discussion on > hangouts which can impact the project (generally speaking) has to happen on > the mailing list. > > It provides project transparency and facilitates the new contribution > onboarding. > > Thanks ! > > Regards > JB > >
